Skip to main content

Security report for apostrophe.ua

Апостроф · Media · Ukraine

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Апостроф is a Ukrainian online news media outlet established in 2014, providing comprehensive news coverage, analytical articles, interviews, and video content focused on Ukrainian society, politics, economy, and world events. The website targets Ukrainian-speaking audiences interested in current affairs and cultural topics. It operates primarily on an advertising revenue model, leveraging Google Adsense and Google Tag Manager for monetization and analytics. The site demonstrates a good level of digital maturity with modern JavaScript libraries and responsive design, ensuring a positive user experience across devices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers, though there is room for improvement in privacy compliance and incident response transparency. Overall, Апостроф presents as a credible and professional media entity with consistent branding and quality content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apostrophe.ua

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a solid market position within the Ukrainian media landscape, serving a broad audience with diverse content categories including politics, economy, society, and culture. Its business model relies on digital advertising and content monetization. The presence of editorial policy and active social media channels supports its credibility and audience engagement. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, indicating an independent operation. The site’s content quality and navigation support user retention and growth potential. Strategic partnerships or payment processors are not explicitly identified in the provided data.

Security posture

Апостроф exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of modern polyfills and scripts indicate good development practices. However, the lack of a visible cookie consent mechanism and absence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies highlight compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR and privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Enhancing transparency around security policies and user data handling would strengthen trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a clear and visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and privacy laws.
  2. Publish detailed incident response and security policies accessible to users.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit and easily accessible contact information including security and general inquiry emails.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all audiences.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Апостроф
Description
Новини України та аналітичні матеріали від Апострофа
Key services
News publishing, Analytical articles, Interviews, Video content (Апостроф TV), Special projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Swiper.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Adsense, CDNJS, JSDelivr, IntersectionObserver polyfill
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Preloading of critical resources
  • Use of modern JavaScript polyfills
  • No exposed credentials in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Google Ad Manager
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional Ukrainian news media outlet with comprehensive topical coverage
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page; contact page likely exists but not in provided content
  3. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite use of tracking and advertising scripts
  4. Strong use of Google advertising and analytics ecosystem
  5. Good SEO and metadata implementation including Open Graph tags
  6. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond editorial policy
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with a modern JavaScript tech stack including Swiper.js for sliders, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Google Adsense for advertising. Resources are loaded via reputable CDNs such as CDNJS and JSDelivr. The site preloads critical CSS and scripts to optimize performance, achieving moderate loading speeds. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No major technical debts or risks were identified, but adding structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO and accessibility would be beneficial.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apostrophe.ua. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apostrophe.ua.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.