Skip to main content

Security report for apolloskypark.lv

SIA "APL SKYPARK" · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website apolloskypark.lv represents SIA "APL SKYPARK", a medium-sized family entertainment center located in Riga, Latvia. The business offers a variety of leisure services including a large trampoline zone, children's play city, party rooms, autodrome, laser tag arena, and a family restaurant. The target audience is families, children, and groups seeking recreational activities. The company appears to be well-established locally with clear contact information and a physical address. Technically, the website is built on the Greativ CMS platform and employs modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good design quality and user experience. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. Performance is moderate with multimedia content. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses common tracking scripts but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust assessment. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for its business purpose but could improve security posture and privacy compliance. The absence of WHOIS data is a limitation but does not negate the legitimacy indicated by business registration and contact details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apolloskypark.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
73
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality and retail sectors focusing on family entertainment and leisure services. Its business model revolves around ticket sales for attractions, party room rentals, and food services. The market position is local to Riga, targeting families and groups. The presence of multiple service offerings and a dedicated restaurant suggests diversified revenue streams. The company maintains an active online presence with social media integration and marketing tools. Partnerships with related entertainment venues and a website development partner indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Growth potential exists through group visits and corporate events. The business demonstrates operational maturity with clear contact channels and service descriptions.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, which is mandatory, but the lack of explicit security headers reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces some privacy considerations. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed through a privacy policy, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a gap. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident on the site. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing incident response contacts to enhance security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "APL SKYPARK"
Registration number
40203240993
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "APL SKYPARK"
Description
Izklaides centrs visai ģimenei, kas ietver milzīgu batutu zonu, bērnu atrakciju pilsētiņu četros stāvos, 20 ballīšu istabas, autodromu un iespaidīgu lāzertag arēnu, kas sniedz neatkārtojamas emocijas un prieku.
Key services
Batutu un rotaļu zona, Ballīšu istabas, Autodroms, Lāzertags, Ģimenes restorāns, Korporatīvie pasākumi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Vanilla LazyLoad, Greativ CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern analytics and tracking scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present but cookie consent is missing.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Use of multiple tracking and analytics services indicates moderate user tracking.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Website targets family entertainment and leisure market in Latvia.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  10. Modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools are used.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern CMS (Greativ) and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images, enhancing performance. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are present but basic. No major technical debt or errors were observed in the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate due to multimedia content but acceptable for the business use case. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for optimization in security and privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apolloskypark.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apolloskypark.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.