Skip to main content

Security report for apkartpasaulei.lv

Ceļojumu aģentūra Apkārt pasaulei · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ceļojumu aģentūra Apkārt pasaulei is a Latvian travel agency specializing in organized tours and vacation packages to destinations such as Bosnia, Croatia, Greece, and Portugal. The website is built on WordPress and employs various plugins for enhanced user experience, including photo galleries and sliders. The site targets Latvian-speaking travelers seeking curated travel experiences. While the site presents clear contact information and social media presence, it lacks a visible privacy policy and terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and user trust. Technically, the site uses HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, but lacks visible security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apkartpasaulei.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small travel agency focused on the Latvian market, offering packaged tours and bus travel arrangements. Its competitive advantage lies in curated travel offers with detailed itineraries and pricing. The business model is service-based, generating revenue from travel bookings. The target customers are Latvian travelers interested in group tours and vacation packages. The website's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators are not visible from the site content. The company maintains a Facebook presence, enhancing customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. There is no evidence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits incident response readiness. The absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages also indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities in plugins or configurations.
  5. Enhance transparency by adding terms of service and data protection officer contact information if applicable.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ceļojumu aģentūra Apkārt pasaulei
Description
Travel agency offering trips and tours, including destinations like Bosnia, Croatia, Greece, Portugal, and Madeira with detailed travel offers and pricing.
Key services
Organized travel tours, Vacation packages, Bus travel arrangements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Fluent Forms, Photo Gallery plugin, Post Slider WD plugin, AddToAny sharing, Google Analytics
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://apkartpasaulei.lv/)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddToAny sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based travel agency site in Latvian language
  2. Contact info including email, phone, and physical address clearly displayed
  3. Cookie consent banner present indicating some privacy compliance effort
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  6. No explicit security headers detected
  7. Google Analytics used for tracking
  8. No adult or questionable content found
  9. Site uses multiple WordPress plugins for galleries, forms, and sliders
  10. Social media presence on Facebook linked
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 and uses a variety of plugins such as Fluent Forms, Photo Gallery, Post Slider WD, and AddToAny for social sharing. It employs jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Performance appears moderate with responsive design elements and mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with some inline styles and scripts for emoji support and sliders. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format describing the organization and person associated with the site. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business WordPress site but could benefit from performance and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apkartpasaulei.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apkartpasaulei.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.