Skip to main content

Security report for apexawards.com

Communications Concepts, Inc. · Media · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

APEX Awards, operated by Communications Concepts, Inc., is a well-established organization specializing in an annual awards competition recognizing excellence in print, electronic, and web publications. The company provides advisory services to publishing, PR, and marketing professionals and has a history dating back to 1984. The website is built on the Ontraport platform and integrates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Materialize CSS, reflecting a moderate to good level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and presents professional content targeted at corporate, nonprofit, agency, and freelance communicators. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain protections in place, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apexawards.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media and non-profit sectors, focusing on awards and publishing advisory services. Its market position is strong given the long domain age and established awards program. The business model revolves around organizing competitions, publishing related content, and offering certificates. Target customers include communication professionals across various sectors. The company leverages partnerships with social media platforms for outreach but does not show evidence of extensive affiliate or advertising networks. Growth indicators include consistent annual awards and a presence on multiple social media channels. The company maintains a focused niche with a clear brand identity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration statuses prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses secure forms via Ontraport but lacks explicit security policy documentation. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not clearly demonstrated.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Include explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Communications Concepts, Inc.
Description
Communications Concepts, Inc. advises publishing, PR and marketing professionals on best practices to improve their publications and communications programs. They organize the APEX Awards for Publication Excellence, an annual awards competition covering print, electronic, and web publications, writing, design, websites, video, and social media. The awards are open to corporate, nonprofit, agency, and freelance communicators.
Key services
Annual awards competition (APEX Awards), Publishing and communications advisory, Publishing of Writer's Web Watch and Writing That Works Archives, Award certificates ordering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Materialize CSS, Ontraport Pages v3, jQuery (implied by slider scripts)
Frameworks
Materialize CSS, Ontraport platform
Platforms
Ontraport
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Ontraport marketing automation
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages.
  3. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter (X), and LinkedIn with official company pages.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  5. Website uses Ontraport platform for CMS and marketing automation.
  6. HTTPS is enabled with no visible SSL issues.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Content is professional and relevant to publishing and awards.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Ontraport platform using Materialize CSS and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile responsive and has a clean, professional design. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external assets hosted on Ontraport and GoDaddy infrastructure. The use of sliders and lazy loading images indicates some optimization efforts. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apexawards.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apexawards.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.