Skip to main content

Security report for apetee.com

Apetee · Hospitality · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Apetee is a Czech Republic-based online platform specializing in restaurant discovery and table reservations. It offers a comprehensive directory of dining establishments including restaurants, pubs, bars, pizzerias, breweries, cafes, and confectioneries. The platform targets consumers seeking convenient online booking and detailed restaurant information. With a domain age since 2017 and over 17,000 listings, Apetee holds a solid position in the local hospitality market. Technically, the website leverages modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and FontAwesome, and is built on OctoberCMS, hosted by a reputable Czech provider. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and interactive features like date pickers and reservation modals. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a Content Security Policy header, but lacks DNSSEC and some advanced security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner and a terms PDF that likely includes privacy information, but no dedicated privacy or security policies are published. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of apetee.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apetee.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Apetee operates as an important entity in the hospitality sector, focusing on the Czech market. Its business model revolves around providing a centralized platform for restaurant listings and online reservations, generating value through user engagement and partnerships with restaurants. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive database and integrated reservation system. Revenue streams likely include restaurant subscriptions or commissions on bookings. The target customers are local consumers and tourists seeking dining options. The company maintains active social media channels and a newsletter to engage users. The partnership ecosystem includes restaurant-specific subdomains for reservations, indicating a scalable and modular approach. Growth indicators include a large number of listings and continuous content updates via blogs and newsletters. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding security policies and enhancing GDPR compliance to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a Content Security Policy header implemented. However, the absence of DNSSEC, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and other common security headers indicates room for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site uses secure login and registration forms but lacks published incident response or security policies, which could impact readiness for security events. GDPR compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no comprehensive privacy policy or data protection officer information. The security culture appears basic, focusing on essential protections but missing advanced practices. Business impact of current gaps is moderate, mainly affecting trust and compliance rather than immediate operational risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Develop and clearly present a comprehensive privacy policy aligned with GDPR requirements, including data retention and user rights.
  5. Enhance trust signals by adding certifications or testimonials and providing clear contact information including phone numbers and physical addresses.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Apetee
Description
Platform providing comprehensive information, contacts, photos, and online table reservations for restaurants, pubs, bars, pizzerias, breweries, cafes, and confectioneries in the Czech Republic.
Key services
Restaurant listings, Online table reservations, Restaurant profiles with photos and contact info, Blog focused on food and cooking, Newsletter subscription for gastro news
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.4.0, FontAwesome 5.8.1, Google Fonts (Roboto), Owl Carousel, Modal Video, Gijgo Datepicker, Popper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy header present
  • Secure login and registration forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Newsletter subscription form
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No privacy policy page explicitly found but terms and conditions PDF likely contains privacy info.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Website uses modern frontend libraries and a CMS (OctoberCMS).
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed on the homepage or footer.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram confirmed.
  8. Multiple forms for login, registration, and newsletter subscription present.
  9. No visible GDPR compliance statements beyond cookie consent.
  10. No advanced security headers beyond CSP.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on OctoberCMS, utilizing a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.4.0, FontAwesome 5.8.1, and Google Fonts. It integrates third-party libraries for UI components such as date pickers and carousels. Hosting is provided by WEDOS Internet, a reputable Czech provider. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and optimized CSS usage. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and mobile navigation toggles. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and incomplete security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface. Overall, the infrastructure is stable and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 49/100High35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apetee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apetee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.