Skip to main content

Security report for antom.com

Antom · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Antom is a global payment solutions provider offering a comprehensive suite of payment, growth, and digitisation services tailored for merchants across various verticals. Positioned as a leading player in the global payments industry, Antom leverages acquiring licenses and partnerships spanning multiple countries to serve over 1.6 billion consumers worldwide. Their platform supports over 300 payment methods and 100 currencies, targeting e-commerce platforms, digital services, travel, gaming, and more. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and employs advanced tracking and marketing tools, ensuring a fast, mobile-optimized, and accessible user experience. Security-wise, Antom demonstrates strong practices including HTTPS enforcement and AI-powered fraud prevention, though explicit security headers and incident response disclosures are lacking. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, but the absence of WHOIS data and direct contact details suggests areas for improvement in transparency and security communication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching antom.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Antom operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on payment processing and digital marketing solutions. Their business model centers on providing unified payment services with vertical-specific solutions, enabling merchants to streamline transactions globally. The company benefits from strong partnerships and subsidiaries such as Ant International, 2C2P, Bettr, and WorldFirst, enhancing its market reach and credibility. Their target customers include large enterprises and merchants requiring multi-currency and multi-method payment capabilities. The website content and branding reflect a mature, well-established organization with a clear growth strategy and comprehensive service offerings. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and direct contact information may impact perceived credibility among cautious clients.

Security posture

Antom's security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and advanced fraud management solutions like Antom Shield. The site integrates AI-powered risk management and chargeback dispute tools, indicating a mature security approach. However, the absence of common security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages represent gaps in transparency and best practices. No direct security contact channels were found, which could hinder timely incident reporting. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts necessitates regular security audits to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing explicit policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide direct security contact channels (e.g., security@antom.com or abuse@antom.com) on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and dependencies to prevent supply chain vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Antom
Description
Antom is a leading provider of payment, growth and digitisation services to merchants worldwide. Their unified merchant payment solutions are tailored for different verticals to meet the payment needs for merchants of all sizes.
Key services
Checkout Payment, Scan to Link, Auto Debit, Subscription Payment, In-Store Payment, Revenue Booster, Combined Payment, Flexible Settlement, Digital Marketing (A+ Rewards, Payment Marketing), Vertical-specific solutions (E-commerce, Gaming, Travel, Digital Services)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), JavaScript, CSS Modules, Swiper.js (carousel), Proxy for Tracert analytics, Alipay tracking scripts, Marmot-cloud CDN
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of AI-powered risk management (Antom Shield)
  • Fraud prevention and chargeback management tools

Analytics and tracking

Services
Alipay Tracert, Alipay Monitor
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
GDT (Tencent)
Tracking pixels
Alipay Tracert, Alipay Monitor
Marketing tools
Alipay+ Rewards, Payment Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, which is unusual for a .com domain.
  3. Strong branding and consistent messaging aligned with Ant International group.
  4. Comprehensive product and solution offerings with detailed documentation.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages; contact via form only.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response pages found.
  7. Use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React framework, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO. It uses CSS modules for styling and integrates Swiper.js for interactive carousels. Hosting is via a CDN (marmot-cloud.com), contributing to fast load times and global availability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Analytics and tracking are implemented through Alipay's Tracert and Monitor scripts, alongside Tencent's GDT ad network. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, though improvements could be made in security header configurations and explicit privacy compliance disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with antom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review antom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.