Skip to main content

Security report for antinomy.studio

ANTINOMY STUDIO B.V. · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Antinomy Studio is a global digital creative agency based in Amsterdam, specializing in building contemporary brands and immersive digital experiences. Their services include brand design, development, strategy, animation, and motion graphics, targeting businesses seeking innovative digital branding solutions. The website showcases a professional portfolio with multimedia content and industry recognition, positioning Antinomy as a reputable player in the creative media sector. Technically, the website leverages modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and CMS solutions like DatoCMS, integrating third-party services including Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with rich media content embedded via Vimeo. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, indicating areas for compliance improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, but the website's professional presentation and contact information support its legitimacy. Overall, Antinomy Studio presents a strong digital presence with room for enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to further build trust and meet regulatory standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching antinomy.studio

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Antinomy Studio operates as a small-sized essential entity within the media and technology sectors, offering creative digital services globally. Their business model focuses on delivering high-quality brand design and digital experiences, supported by a portfolio of notable clients and projects. The company benefits from industry awards, enhancing its competitive advantage. Target customers include brands across entertainment, luxury, web3, and e-commerce industries. The absence of detailed financial or founding data limits deeper revenue or growth analysis. The company maintains a professional online presence with active social media channels, indicating engagement with a broad partnership ecosystem and market visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts suggests limited transparency in security governance. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms, posing potential regulatory risks under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but the site could benefit from enhanced security controls and formalized data protection practices to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and ensure secure third-party integrations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and document data retention policies to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ANTINOMY STUDIO B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ANTINOMY STUDIO B.V.
Description
Antinomy is a global creative studio building contemporary brands in the digital realm. They create immersive digital spaces challenging the ways people interact with brands.
Key services
Brand design, Digital experience design, Development, Strategy, Animation, Motion graphics, WebGL
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, WebGL, Vimeo video embedding, DatoCMS (graphql.datocms.com), Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. No contact phone numbers found, only email and physical address
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, likely privacy protected
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS
  6. Presence of tracking scripts without explicit cookie consent
  7. Strong branding and portfolio presentation
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Nuxt.js and DatoCMS, enabling dynamic content management and server-side rendering. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity supports analytics and user behavior tracking. Multimedia content is delivered via Vimeo, ensuring high-quality video performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preloading strategies for CSS and scripts, contributing to moderate performance. However, the lack of detected security headers and incomplete privacy implementations indicate technical debt in security and compliance areas. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and enhance accessibility to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with antinomy.studio. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review antinomy.studio.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.