Skip to main content

Security report for anticimex.no

Anticimex · Real Estate · Norway

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anticimex is a professional service provider specializing in pest control, food safety, and building inspections primarily serving private individuals and businesses in Norway. The company offers a broad range of services including digital pest control solutions, pest insurance, disinfection, and building inspection services. Their market position is that of an established and trusted provider in the Norwegian market, supported by a well-structured and content-rich website. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Gatsby and React, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The site employs standard analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight, alongside a robust cookie consent mechanism, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses multiple security headers, and integrates CAPTCHA for form protection. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the website presents a low risk with no detected vulnerabilities or suspicious content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the professional presentation and comprehensive content support the legitimacy of the business. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies and providing vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anticimex.no

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention anticimex.no, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
225
Employees
6
Customers
28
Third parties
191
Weak passwords
5%

Latest record dated 2026-05-25 · 3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for anticimex.no.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –minesider.anticimex.no2026-05-25
  • –r.anticimex.no2025-11-04
  • –minesider.anticimex.no2025-07-31
  • –minesider.anticimex.no2025-07-20
  • –minesider.anticimex.no2025-04-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anticimex operates in the real estate and environmental services sectors, focusing on pest control and building safety. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting both private consumers and commercial clients. The company leverages digital tools such as smart pest control systems to differentiate itself in the market. The website indicates a large organizational size with a comprehensive service portfolio and multiple contact channels. The presence of structured navigation and detailed service descriptions suggests a mature marketing approach. Partnerships or related domains are not explicitly identified, but the use of a branded link domain (link.anticimex.no) suggests internal service platforms. Growth indicators include digital service offerings and extensive content marketing through blogs and news sections.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enforcement and a suite of security headers that protect against common web vulnerabilities. The integration of CAPTCHA on forms reduces the risk of automated abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response plan is a gap in transparency and preparedness. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for mature security programs. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and public communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer or security contact to comply with GDPR and improve communication.
  4. Regularly review and update security headers and SSL/TLS configurations to maintain high security standards.
  5. Enhance business credibility by adding certifications or trust badges related to security and quality standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anticimex
Description
Anticimex hjelper deg med skadedyrkontroll, mattrygghet og bygnings-/ boliginspeksjoner.
Key services
Skadedyrkontroll (Pest control), Mattrygghet (Food safety), Boliginspeksjoner (Building/Home inspections), Skadedyrforsikring (Pest insurance), Digital skadedyrkontroll (Smart digital pest control), Desinfisering (Disinfection services)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Gatsby, React, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CAPTCHA (Google reCAPTCHA)
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to domain not registered or privacy restrictions
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  6. Clear contact information with phone and contact forms
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern static site generator (Gatsby) with React, ensuring fast load times and good SEO. The use of Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight indicates advanced analytics and marketing capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. No legacy or vulnerable libraries were detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Performance is fast, and the site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Technical risks are minimal, but the lack of visible WHOIS data and domain registration details could pose a risk for domain ownership verification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anticimex.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anticimex.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.