Skip to main content

Security report for anouk.org

Anouk Foundation · Healthcare · Switzerland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anouk Foundation is a small non-profit organization based in Geneva, Switzerland, focused on enhancing healthcare environments through art. Their mission is to create positive, healing spaces by designing murals that improve the well-being of patients and residents in social and medical institutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting healthcare providers and institutions seeking to improve patient experience through art. Technically, the website is built on a modern platform with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5 technologies, including service workers for progressive web app capabilities and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and performs moderately well, hosted likely on a CDN associated with multiscreensite.com. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident and could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is typical for non-profits, and no suspicious patterns were found. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and good privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and adding a terms of service page to improve transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anouk.org

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anouk Foundation occupies a niche market at the intersection of healthcare and art, leveraging creative solutions to improve patient environments. Their competitive advantage lies in their specialized focus on murals and healing spaces, supported by a clear mission and professional digital presence. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and partnerships with healthcare institutions. The foundation targets healthcare providers, social institutions, and patients/residents, indicating a B2B and B2C hybrid model. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and a well-maintained website. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and third-party service providers like Cookiebot and Elfsight for website functionality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and GDPR-compliant cookie management. The absence of explicit security headers suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed credentials were found. The lack of published security or incident response policies is a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security headers and documented policies to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible from the website.
  3. Add a terms of service page to improve legal transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anouk Foundation
Description
Anouk Foundation is a bridge between art and well-being. We believe in the power of positive environments to help welcome, heal, reassure. We create walls that patients/residents are delighted by, interact with, and learn from. We design the right mural to improve their environment and the quality of their journey. We use art to improve healing and promote well-being, in social and medical institutions.
Key services
Design and creation of murals, Improving patient and resident environments, Promoting well-being through art
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Service Workers, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Service worker registration for PWA

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Elfsight widgets
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to healthcare and art.
  3. Clear contact information including phone, email, and physical address in Geneva, Switzerland.
  4. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR compliance.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, but no suspicious indicators found.
  7. Social media presence on major platforms supports trustworthiness.
  8. No terms of service page found, which is a minor gap.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern tech stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, leveraging service workers for offline capabilities and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. It is hosted on a CDN, likely multiscreensite.com, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for improved security headers and potential dependency management for third-party scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anouk.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anouk.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.