Skip to main content

Security report for anopress.cz

NEWTON Media, a.s. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NEWTON Media, a.s. operates the Anopress service, a sophisticated media monitoring platform focused on Czech media channels including print, TV, radio, internet, and social media. The company offers a cloud-based, real-time monitoring solution with a comprehensive historical archive dating back to 1996. Their client base spans businesses, PR agencies, government bodies, municipalities, and educational institutions, positioning them as a leading media intelligence provider in the Czech Republic. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and client references. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, anime.js, and slick carousel, alongside Google Analytics and Intercom for analytics and customer engagement. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured, though some accessibility and SEO optimizations could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms required for full GDPR compliance. Overall, the security posture is good with no critical vulnerabilities detected. The absence of a cookie consent banner and security headers are notable gaps. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy and consistency of the business registration, reinforcing trustworthiness. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility and SEO to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anopress.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anopress is positioned as a mature, specialized media monitoring service with a unique value proposition of a vast, structured Czech media database. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of media coverage, historical depth, and real-time alerting capabilities. The subscription SaaS model targets a diverse clientele including corporations, PR agencies, government, and academia. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a strong brand presence with reputable clients. Growth potential exists in expanding digital media coverage and enhancing analytics features. The parent company NEWTON Media supports credibility and operational stability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. Use of third-party scripts like Intercom and Google Analytics is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder transparency and trust. GDPR compliance is partially met with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but can be improved with better header policies and published security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with EU privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
NEWTON Media, a.s.
VAT number
CZ28168356
Registration number
28168356
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NEWTON Media, a.s.
Description
Anopress provides an intelligent media monitoring service offering a unique, cloud-based, fully responsive database of Czech media including print, television, radio, internet, and social media. The service enables real-time monitoring and alerting of media content relevant to clients.
Key services
Media monitoring (print, TV, radio, internet, social media), Real-time alerts and email notifications, Access to historical media archives since 1996, Client support and customization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, jQuery UI, anime.js, slick carousel, responsiveMenu, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Intercom
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Intercom with app ID
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Intercom
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Intercom
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking.
  2. No cookie consent banner found despite EU privacy policy presence.
  3. No explicit terms of service found on the site.
  4. Contact information is complete and professional.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Business is well established with clear market positioning.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end stack with jQuery, jQuery UI, anime.js for animations, slick carousel for responsive sliders, and a custom responsive menu. Google Fonts are loaded via CDN. Analytics and user engagement are handled by Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Intercom. The site is mobile responsive and uses minified CSS and JS for performance. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles but could be improved. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are present but could be expanded.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anopress.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anopress.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.