Skip to main content

Security report for annacichosz.pl

Anna Cichosz · Retail · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anna Cichosz operates a Polish-language fashion e-commerce website specializing in high-quality designer clothing including Haute Couture and Pret a Porter collections. The site targets fashion-conscious consumers in Poland, offering a curated selection of dresses, suits, and accessories. The business appears to be a small-sized, established brand with a domain registered since 2010, indicating a stable market presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging modern frontend libraries such as Bootstrap and Swiper.js, and SEO optimized with Yoast. The site is mobile-friendly and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure e-commerce forms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or terms of service documentation, which are compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 21 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching annacichosz.pl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself in the premium fashion retail sector, focusing on online sales of exclusive clothing collections. Its competitive advantage lies in high-quality materials and designer craftsmanship. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce, supported by WooCommerce. The target customer segment is Polish-speaking fashion consumers seeking unique and high-end apparel. The partnership with cyberstores.pl suggests reliance on specialized e-commerce platform services. Growth indicators include active product updates and new collections for 2025. However, incomplete social media links and lack of contact details may limit customer engagement. The absence of privacy and security policies could pose risks in regulated markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. WooCommerce forms are used securely with AJAX add-to-cart functionality. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are available. GDPR compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no privacy policy found. The domain is stable and legitimate, with no suspicious WHOIS patterns. Regular plugin and theme updates and security audits are recommended to maintain and improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve GDPR compliance and customer trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance site security.
  3. Add clear contact information including company email and phone number to improve business credibility and customer support.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anna Cichosz
Description
ANNA CICHOSZ FASHION - Fashion brand offering high-quality clothing collections including Haute Couture, Pret a Porter, evening dresses, wedding dresses, and accessories.
Key services
Online sales of fashion products, Fashion collections presentation, Customer account and favorites management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure WooCommerce forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site for a fashion brand.
  2. Content is primarily in Polish language targeting Polish customers.
  3. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating some GDPR awareness.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or header/footer.
  6. Social media links are present but URLs are placeholders (#), indicating incomplete social media integration.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No incident response or security contact information provided.
  9. Site uses modern frontend libraries and SEO plugins (Yoast).
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. Frontend technologies include jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, and Yoast SEO plugin for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and loads with moderate performance. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely managed by the e-commerce platform partner cyberstores.pl. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional e-commerce experience but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with annacichosz.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review annacichosz.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.