Skip to main content

Security report for animalhealtheurope.eu

AnimalhealthEurope · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AnimalhealthEurope is a European association representing manufacturers of animal medicines, vaccines, and other animal health products. The organization serves as an industry advocate and information hub for stakeholders in the animal health sector across Europe. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear focus on its core mission and audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and FontAwesome, and integrates Google Analytics with IP anonymization to track user interactions while respecting some privacy considerations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no obvious vulnerabilities detected in the provided content, though security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Privacy and cookie policies are not found, indicating a compliance gap that should be addressed to meet GDPR and other regulatory requirements. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned within its niche but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching animalhealtheurope.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention animalhealtheurope.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
78
Employees
4
Customers
0
Third parties
74
Weak passwords
3%

Latest record dated 2025-08-16 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for animalhealtheurope.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –resources.animalhealtheurope.eu2025-08-16
  • –members.animalhealtheurope.eu2025-07-19
  • –resources.animalhealtheurope.eu2025-07-07
  • –members.animalhealtheurope.eu2025-06-24

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as an essential entity within the healthcare sector, specifically focusing on animal health products in Europe. Its business model centers on industry representation and advocacy rather than direct commercial sales. The website targets manufacturers and stakeholders in the veterinary and animal health industries, positioning itself as a key industry association. The presence of official social media channels and structured data enhances its market credibility. While no direct revenue streams or subsidiaries are identified, the association likely relies on membership fees and industry partnerships. The website content quality and branding consistency support a professional image, aiding in stakeholder engagement and influence within the European animal health market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google Analytics configured to anonymize IP addresses, reflecting awareness of privacy best practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and explicit incident response contact points limits its security robustness. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also exposes compliance risks under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. To improve, the organization should implement comprehensive security headers, publish clear privacy and cookie policies, and establish formal incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and prominently link a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AnimalhealthEurope
Description
AnimalhealthEurope is the association representing manufacturers of animal medicines, vaccines and other animal health products in Europe.
Key services
representation of manufacturers, advocacy for animal medicines and vaccines, industry information dissemination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, jQuery, Bootstrap 4.6, FontAwesome, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS with anonymize_ip in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage HTML.
  3. Social media presence is established with official Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn links.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern libraries and frameworks.
  5. SSL is implemented with HTTPS and Google Analytics anonymizes IP addresses.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML snippet.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. Content is focused on animal health industry association in Europe.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress platform using Bootstrap 4.6 for responsive design and FontAwesome for iconography, indicating a modern and maintainable tech stack. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and marketing tracking, with IP anonymization enabled. Hosting is provided by OVH SAS, a reputable European hosting provider. Performance is moderate with standard CDN usage for fonts and scripts. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were identified in the provided content. Opportunities exist to modernize security headers and enhance privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with animalhealtheurope.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review animalhealtheurope.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.