Skip to main content

Security report for angiology.cz

Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.angiology.cz/intro serves as an entry point for healthcare professionals, restricting access to medical content intended solely for this audience. The site uses a basic ASP.NET WebForms framework with legacy JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The content is minimal and primarily serves as a gatekeeper rather than a full informational portal. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and using outdated libraries. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner present but no accessible privacy policy on this page. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which reduces transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angiology.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention angiology.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
7
Employees
0
Customers
7
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for angiology.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets healthcare professionals in the Czech Republic, providing restricted access to specialized medical content. The business model appears to be informational and access-controlled, possibly subscription or membership-based, though no explicit monetization details are visible. The site lacks public contact information and company details, which limits direct business intelligence. The use of Czech language and domain suggests a local market focus. The absence of WHOIS data and minimal external partnerships indicate a small-scale or niche operation. The integration of Google services suggests standard digital marketing practices but no advanced ecosystem partnerships are evident.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (inferred from external scripts loaded over HTTPS) and implements a cookie consent banner, indicating some GDPR awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.7.2) presents potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is available. The lack of WHOIS transparency further complicates trust assessment. Overall, the site should improve security controls, update libraries, and publish clear privacy and security policies to enhance compliance and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy accessible from all pages and ensure GDPR compliance is clearly communicated.
  4. Add visible and verified contact information and business credentials to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Conduct a security audit and implement secure coding practices for all forms and user inputs.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website is intended for healthcare professionals only, providing access to content restricted to medical personnel.
Key services
restricted medical content access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7.2, Bootstrap CSS, Google Fonts (Fira Sans, Source Sans Pro), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, MeanMenu jQuery plugin, ASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Tag Manager script loaded over https)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and targeted exclusively at healthcare professionals.
  2. No public contact information or company details are provided on the landing page.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented, but privacy policy page is not linked or found on this page.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed.
  6. Use of outdated jQuery version (1.7.2) may pose security risks.
  7. No social media or direct contact channels found.
  8. External links mostly to trusted domains (Google services, Seznam.cz).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms with legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7.2 and Bootstrap CSS for styling. Google Fonts and Google Analytics/Tag Manager are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive using MeanMenu for navigation on smaller screens. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or advanced semantic markup observed. SEO optimization is minimal, with only basic meta tags present. The hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not disclosed. The technical stack is functional but outdated, presenting modernization opportunities to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angiology.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angiology.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.