Skip to main content

Security report for angelato.cz

Makser s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Angelato.cz is a small, family-run artisanal ice cream business based in Prague, Czech Republic, operating since 2007. The company produces high-quality ice cream and sorbets using natural ingredients and offers retail sales through multiple physical locations, catering services, and an online e-shop. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and technologies, providing a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angelato.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Angelato positions itself as a premium artisanal ice cream brand in the Prague hospitality and retail sector. Its competitive advantage lies in unique flavor offerings and a strong local presence with multiple outlets. The business model combines direct retail, catering, and e-commerce sales. The company targets local consumers and tourists seeking quality ice cream experiences. The presence of a newsletter and social media channels supports customer engagement and marketing efforts. The company is registered as Makser s.r.o. with clear contact details and VAT registration, enhancing business credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and protocol downgrade attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site uses standard WordPress plugins and scripts without detected vulnerable libraries, but regular updates and security hardening are recommended. Forms such as the newsletter subscription collect user emails but no explicit privacy or data protection notices are provided, indicating compliance gaps.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a privacy policy and cookie policy pages to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by providing clear consent mechanisms for cookies and data collection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Makser s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ25601326
Registration number
25601326
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Makser s.r.o.
Description
Angelato is a family-run artisanal ice cream manufacturer based in Prague, producing high-quality ice cream daily without artificial additives. They emphasize freshness, creativity, and quality, offering seasonal sorbets and unique flavor combinations. They operate multiple locations in Prague and provide catering and e-shop services.
Key services
Artisanal ice cream production, Retail sales at multiple Prague locations, Catering services, Online e-shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.7.14, jQuery 3.5.1, Bootstrap CSS, Elementor page builder, Elementskit plugin, Photo Gallery plugin, Simple Back To Top plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of deferred loading for emoji script

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Newsletter subscription form
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based artisanal ice cream business site with multiple Prague locations.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  4. No visible security headers or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond basic newsletter form.
  6. Mobile responsive design with good navigation and content quality.
  7. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  8. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.7.14 with Elementor and several plugins for gallery, UI enhancements, and newsletter functionality. It uses jQuery 3.5.1 and Bootstrap for responsive design. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses deferred loading for emoji scripts to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive menus and adaptive images. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD for business or product schema. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in caching and asset optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angelato.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angelato.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.