Skip to main content

Security report for angel-porns.com

Angel Porn · Media · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Angel Porn is a niche adult media website specializing in reviews of adult pornographic sites, particularly focusing on transsexual and shemale content. The site operates primarily as an affiliate marketing platform, providing detailed reviews and referral links to various adult entertainment sites. The website has been active since 2007, indicating a long-standing presence in the adult content review niche. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML and CSS, lacks modern frameworks or CMS, and shows limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no evidence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent or privacy policies. The site relies heavily on affiliate links to external adult sites and advertising networks, with minimal user tracking and no visible analytics services. Overall, the site presents basic content quality and navigation but lacks professional polish and robust security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angel-porns.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on affiliate marketing within the adult entertainment sector, targeting adult users interested in transsexual and shemale pornographic content. The site leverages partnerships with numerous adult affiliate programs and related adult dating platforms. Market positioning is niche and specialized, catering to a specific adult audience segment. Revenue streams likely derive from affiliate commissions and advertising. The absence of clear company contact information and privacy policies suggests limited transparency and compliance focus. The site’s long domain age supports credibility in the niche, but technical and security shortcomings may impact user trust and growth potential.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. Critical issues include lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The site collects user input via a contact form but does not demonstrate secure handling or privacy assurances. These gaps expose the site and its users to potential risks such as data interception, privacy violations, and reputational damage. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident. The security posture requires significant improvement to mitigate risks and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact channels.
  5. Enhance website design and mobile responsiveness to improve user experience and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Angel Porn
Description
Angel Porn Reviews offers quality adult porn site reviews to help users choose the best porn sites by providing honest, detailed reviews including pros and cons.
Key services
Adult porn site reviews, Affiliate referrals to adult sites, Content curation for adult entertainment
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
LivePromoTools
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content review site specializing in transsexual/shemale adult sites.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating poor privacy compliance.
  3. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data, indicating weak security posture.
  4. Affiliate marketing is the primary business model with multiple external affiliate links.
  5. Website design and technical implementation are basic and not mobile optimized.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers found; only a contact form is available.
  7. No social media or security incident response contacts found.
  8. Content is explicit adult material, requiring adult-only access.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, which limits usability on diverse devices. Performance is moderate but could benefit from optimization. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection but also limits insights into user behavior. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar (NameCheap, Inc.). The site’s technical debt is evident in outdated design and lack of security best practices, presenting modernization opportunities to improve resilience and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angel-porns.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angel-porns.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.