Skip to main content

Security report for anemos.de

anemos Gesellschaft für Umweltmeteorologie mbH · Energy · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

anemos Gesellschaft für Umweltmeteorologie mbH is a specialized consultancy based in Germany providing environmental meteorology services focused on wind energy. With over 30 years of experience, the company offers a range of services including site assessment, wind atlas data, due diligence, and market value analysis, targeting wind energy investors, developers, and operators. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and comprehensive service descriptions. Technically, the site employs established JavaScript libraries and analytics tools with privacy-conscious implementations such as cookie consent and opt-in tracking. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in HTTP security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
48/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anemos.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
48
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector, specifically wind energy meteorology and consulting. It serves a B2B market with services that support wind park planning, monitoring, and evaluation. The presence of DAkkS accreditation and client references indicates a strong market position and trustworthiness. The business model relies on expert consulting, data services, and software tools like the awis online tool. The company targets investors, operators, and researchers, emphasizing quality and accredited methodologies. The website content and structure support a professional image with clear service offerings and contact channels. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated, suggesting a focused small enterprise.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent with an opt-in mechanism, loading Google Tag Manager and Matomo analytics only after consent, which is a strong privacy practice. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The security score is moderate, reflecting good privacy compliance but room for improvement in security best practices. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is noted. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with additional policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
anemos Gesellschaft für Umweltmeteorologie mbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
anemos Gesellschaft für Umweltmeteorologie mbH
Description
Provider of environmental meteorology services specializing in wind energy site assessment, wind atlas, energy yield calculations, due diligence, and market values with over 30 years of experience.
Key services
Site assessment, Site quality (TR10), Wind atlas, Due diligence, Wind measurements, Performance analysis, Market values, Workshops
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Nivo Slider, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, CookieConsent.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • Google Tag Manager loaded only after consent
  • Piwik/Matomo analytics configured to disable cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and comprehensive business information.
  2. Strong focus on wind energy meteorology and consulting services.
  3. Cookie consent implemented with opt-in and ability to revoke consent.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contact information.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics with privacy considerations.
  6. WHOIS data consistent with business claims and domain usage.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No social media links explicitly found on the homepage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery, Nivo Slider, Owl Carousel, and Matomo analytics, indicating a mature but somewhat dated technology base. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and a cookie consent mechanism integrated. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security headers. The use of deferred script loading and consent-based analytics loading reflects good technical hygiene.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anemos.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anemos.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.