Skip to main content

Security report for andzup.com

andzup · Media · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

andzup is a B2B prospection platform focused on the communication and media industry, providing qualified European market intelligence data and tools to optimize commercial prospecting. The platform targets communication agencies, ad agencies, publishers, and media owners across Europe, with a strong presence in France. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand image, supported by client trust indicators and third-party review badges. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern SEO and analytics tools, including Yoast SEO and Piwik PRO. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA v3 implemented, though security headers are missing and privacy policies are not clearly presented. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business presence appear legitimate. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and suitable for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching andzup.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

andzup operates in the media sector, offering a SaaS platform that centralizes prospecting data and strategic insights to accelerate decision-making and sales performance. The company serves over 1,000 clients and 2,500 professionals across six European markets, indicating a medium-sized business with a solid market position. The partnership with auth.tbsfrance.com for authentication services suggests integration with trusted third-party providers. Revenue likely derives from subscription-based access to the platform and data services. The business model emphasizes GDPR compliance and data quality, targeting professional users in communications and media industries.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection risks. No direct contact information for incident response or vulnerability disclosure is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The missing privacy and cookie policies reduce compliance clarity, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers and clearer compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policy pages to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  4. Consider publishing WHOIS information or using a registrar that provides transparent domain registration data to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics to ensure minimal privacy impact and compliance with data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
andzup
Description
andzup supports you on a daily basis in your commercial prospecting with a qualified European database.
Key services
Qualified data, Strategic insights, Collaborative tools, Integrated automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Piwik PRO analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piwik PRO
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible recent registration or privacy protection.
  3. Website uses modern CMS and SEO tools.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  5. Contact is primarily via forms; no direct emails or phone numbers found in content.
  6. Strong branding and client trust indicators visible.
  7. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, ensuring good SEO and content management capabilities. It uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection and Piwik PRO for analytics, indicating a focus on privacy-friendly tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from trusted CDNs and uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional B2B platform but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with andzup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review andzup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.