Skip to main content

Security report for analvids.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AnalVids.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in hardcore and extreme anal pornographic videos. It offers a large library of videos with features such as recommended content, model and studio browsing, and video filtering. The site targets adult audiences exclusively and positions itself as a major player in the niche adult video streaming market. Technically, the site uses common analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Visual Website Optimizer, and it is mobile optimized with good navigation and content presentation. However, the site lacks visible advanced security headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and detailed privacy compliance features. WHOIS data is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site functions well as an adult content platform but has gaps in security posture and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching analvids.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector, providing streaming and distribution of explicit content. Its business model likely relies on membership access and advertising revenue. The presence of partner domains for customer profile management and content removal suggests a structured operational ecosystem. The site targets mature adult users interested in hardcore anal content, with a large and diverse video catalog. Lack of clear company information and WHOIS transparency may impact trust and regulatory compliance. The site appears to be medium-sized with consistent branding and good content quality, but limited trust signals such as certifications or verified business credentials.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate to low. HTTPS is presumably enabled (not explicitly confirmed), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of advanced security frameworks or incident response contacts. The absence of cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms indicates potential GDPR and privacy regulation gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified from the HTML content, but the lack of WHOIS transparency and contact information reduces overall trust. The site should improve security headers, implement cookie consent, and provide clear security policies and incident response channels to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish detailed privacy and security policies including data retention and user rights information.
  4. Provide clear company contact information and incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Verify and disclose domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Welcome to AnalVids.com, World's Biggest Hardcore and Extreme Porn Library. Inside we have Top Extreme, Double Penetration and Hardcore Porn Videos
Key services
streaming adult videos, video recommendations, model and studio browsing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Bootstrap Icons, Lato font, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult video streaming platform specializing in hardcore anal content.
  2. Content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges detected.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating potential privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  4. No explicit company contact information or security policies are provided on the site.
  5. Privacy and terms pages exist but are basic and lack detailed compliance information.
  6. The site uses common analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics and VWO.
  7. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  8. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation and content presentation.
  9. No security headers or advanced security practices detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with preloaded fonts, Bootstrap icons, and asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Visual Website Optimizer for tracking and optimization. The site is mobile responsive and has a well-structured navigation system. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance appears moderate with some optimization opportunities. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO meta tags are present but could be enhanced. The lack of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are technical gaps that should be addressed to improve compliance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with analvids.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review analvids.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.