Skip to main content

Security report for amsoil.com

AMSOIL, Inc. · Energy · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AMSOIL, Inc. operates a professional e-commerce website specializing in premium synthetic lubricants and motor oils. The company positions itself as a leader in the synthetic lubrication industry with a history of over 40 years. The website targets vehicle owners, commercial customers, and enthusiasts seeking high-quality synthetic oils and related products. The business model focuses on direct online sales, supported by product guides and vehicle fitment tools. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Coveo search, Hotjar, and other marketing and analytics tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, CSRF protections, and reputable third-party scripts, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent but no explicit privacy policy page found. WHOIS data is unavailable or redacted, which is inconsistent with the active and professional website presence, suggesting privacy protection or data redaction. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amsoil.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention amsoil.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,456
Employees
3
Customers
4,442
Third parties
11
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2025-11-14 · 17 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for amsoil.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.amsoil.com2025-11-14
  • –adfs.amsoil.com2025-07-26
  • –adfs.amsoil.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AMSOIL holds a strong market position in the synthetic lubricant sector, leveraging a direct-to-consumer e-commerce platform. The company benefits from a loyal customer base, evidenced by extensive product reviews and preferred customer pricing programs. Its partnership ecosystem includes industrial and international domains, supporting a broad market reach. The business model emphasizes product quality and innovation, with a focus on American manufacturing values. Growth indicators include active promotions, mobile app offerings, and comprehensive product categories. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining domain registration transparency and enhancing privacy policy visibility to strengthen customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, CSRF tokens in forms, and use of reputable analytics and marketing services. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident in the HTML, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of publicly available security or incident response policies limits transparency. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no clear privacy policy page. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contact information are not found, suggesting potential compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing comprehensive security policies and improving HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for security incidents.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve WHOIS domain registration transparency or provide justification for privacy protection to reduce suspicion.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AMSOIL, Inc.
Description
AMSOIL offers premium synthetic motor oils and lubricants engineered to keep vehicles and equipment running cleaner, longer.
Key services
Synthetic motor oils, Lubricants, Additives, Oil filters, Product guides and fitment lookup
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Coveo Search UI, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads, Amazon Ads, Qualtrics, Evergage, Optimizely, Sentry
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), jQuery (implied by jQuery templates)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable analytics and marketing scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Coveo Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Analytics, Bing Analytics, Qualtrics, Sentry
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Amazon Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Bing Ads, Qualtrics, Sentry
Marketing tools
Optimizely, Evergage, Coveo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for synthetic lubricants.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual but not necessarily malicious.
  3. Uses multiple reputable analytics and marketing tools.
  4. No security challenge or WAF blocking detected.
  5. Privacy policy page not explicitly found but cookie consent is implemented.
  6. Terms and conditions are presented in modal dialogs.
  7. Contact information is primarily via contact form and login/register pages.
  8. No explicit phone numbers or emails found in the provided HTML.
  9. Website is mobile optimized and accessible.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and diverse technology stack including Coveo for search, Google Tag Manager for analytics, Hotjar for user behavior tracking, and Optimizely for experimentation. The site is built with responsive design principles, likely leveraging Bootstrap or similar frameworks. Performance appears moderate with preloading of fonts and scripts, though some scripts are loaded asynchronously to optimize load times. Accessibility features are basic but present, including ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. The e-commerce platform appears custom or proprietary with secure form handling and CSRF tokens. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable e-commerce experience with room for performance and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amsoil.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amsoil.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.