Skip to main content

Security report for amourgetaways.com

Amour Getaways · Hospitality · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amour Getaways is a specialized hospitality service provider focusing on unique, romantic travel adventures and events primarily in Puerto Rico and surrounding tropical locations. The company targets couples and groups seeking intimate and exclusive travel experiences, offering services such as tropical getaways, concierge services, romantic vacations, and exclusive retreats. Their market position is niche, catering to luxury and personalized travel experiences with a small business scale. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins including Gravity Forms for contact and lead capture, Google Tag Manager, and Google Analytics for tracking. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with basic accessibility features. SEO is adequately addressed with proper meta tags and structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs some best practices such as IP anonymization in analytics and spam prevention in forms. However, it lacks visible security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is unusual and reduces trust slightly, though the site content and contact information appear legitimate. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small hospitality business but should improve privacy compliance and security hardening to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amourgetaways.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amour Getaways operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on romantic and exclusive travel experiences. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized concierge services and curated retreats in tropical destinations, particularly Puerto Rico. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through travel packages, event planning, and membership concierge offerings. The target customers are couples and groups seeking luxury and intimate travel. The company maintains an active social media presence to engage customers and build brand awareness. Partnerships with web design firms and use of modern digital marketing tools indicate a moderate digital maturity. Growth potential exists in expanding event offerings and geographic reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and some privacy-conscious analytics configurations. The use of honeypot fields in forms helps mitigate spam. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and content injection. No published privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, limiting preparedness for security events. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden site security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing incident response contact information and enhancing security culture through staff training.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amour Getaways
Description
An exclusive experience company specializing in unique, romantic travel adventures and events for couples.
Key services
Tropical Getaways, Concierge Services, Romantic Getaways, Puerto Rico travel experiences, Exclusive Retreats and Events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Gravity Forms plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin), CAOS for WordPress (local analytics hosting), ScrollReveal.js, Modernizr
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Honeypot field in contact form to prevent spam

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins
  5. No visible security headers detected
  6. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual
  7. No adult or explicit content detected
  8. Social media presence on major platforms
  9. No advertising networks detected beyond Google Analytics
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Gravity Forms for form management and Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. It uses CAOS plugin to locally host analytics scripts, improving privacy and performance. Frontend scripts include ScrollReveal for animations and Modernizr for feature detection. The site loads CSS and JS asynchronously and uses preloading for key images, indicating performance optimization efforts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin with structured data in JSON-LD format. However, no hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from adding security headers and improving accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amourgetaways.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amourgetaways.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.