Skip to main content

Security report for amo-inc.com

Johnson & Johnson Vision · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Johnson & Johnson Vision operates a professional website focused on refractive surgery and related eye health products. The company is a recognized leader in the ophthalmology healthcare sector, offering advanced surgical technologies such as iLASIK and femtosecond lasers. The website targets eye health professionals, providing detailed product information, educational resources, and access to ordering and support services. The business is positioned as a market leader with a strong brand presence and extensive industry experience under the Johnson & Johnson umbrella. Technically, the website leverages modern web frameworks including Next.js and React, integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, and WalkMe, and employs robust cookie consent management via OneTrust. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices and performance metrics. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses security headers, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and user consent mechanisms. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response contact information published, which could be improved. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and security posture. Strategic recommendations include publishing a dedicated security policy, providing incident response contacts, and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amo-inc.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention amo-inc.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
15
Employees
0
Customers
15
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
7%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for amo-inc.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Johnson & Johnson Vision is a major player in the healthcare industry specializing in ophthalmic surgical technologies and eye care products. Their business model focuses on B2B sales to eye care professionals and institutions. The company benefits from the strong global brand and resources of its parent, Johnson & Johnson. The website reflects a comprehensive product portfolio and a commitment to ethical standards, as evidenced by their support of the AdvaMed Code of Ethics. The presence of dedicated complaint centers and medical information request portals indicates a well-established customer support and regulatory compliance framework. The target market includes ophthalmologists and eye health professionals seeking advanced surgical solutions. Growth indicators include extensive procedure volumes and ongoing educational outreach. Partnerships with industry organizations and transparency initiatives further strengthen their market position.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy and incident response contact information represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident handling readiness. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are considered best practices for transparency and community engagement. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by formalizing security governance documentation and communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance transparency by detailing data retention policies and privacy practices more explicitly.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Johnson & Johnson Vision
Description
Johnson & Johnson Vision provides refractive surgery products and solutions designed to optimize patient outcomes with technologies such as iLASIK, iDESIGN, iFS Laser, and STAR S4 IR.
Key services
Refractive surgery technology, Ocular surface care, Myopia management, Cataract surgery products
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Optimizely, WalkMe
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise
  • Cookie consent management via OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Optimizely
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Optimizely
Marketing tools
WalkMe
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via forms only.
  4. Strong use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  6. Business is a reputable healthcare entity under Johnson & Johnson.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and improved performance. Content is managed via Contentstack CMS, supporting scalable and flexible content delivery. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Optimizely facilitates advanced analytics and A/B testing capabilities. WalkMe is used for user guidance and onboarding. The site employs OneTrust for cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from further performance tuning and enhanced hosting transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amo-inc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amo-inc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.