Skip to main content

Security report for amimedical.cz

A.M.I. – Analytical Medical Instruments, s. r. o. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A.M.I. – Analytical Medical Instruments, s. r. o. operates a professional website targeted exclusively at healthcare specialists in the Czech Republic, offering analytical medical instruments and diagnostic healthcare products. The company positions itself as a niche provider within the healthcare sector, focusing on compliance with Czech advertising laws for medical products. The website content is professional and clearly states the intended audience, reinforcing its specialized business model. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Oxygen Builder and Yoast SEO, with modern web fonts and jQuery. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO practices. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers or detailed privacy policies beyond a cookie consent mechanism linked to a PDF document. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and provides cookie consent, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response or security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which impacts overall trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency, improved security headers, and clearer contact and privacy information to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amimedical.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets healthcare professionals, complying with Czech legal requirements for medical advertising. Its business model is B2B, focusing on supplying analytical medical instruments and diagnostic devices. The market position is niche and specialized, with no evident large-scale operations or subsidiaries. The website lacks explicit contact details and certifications, which limits visibility into operational scale and partnerships. The use of WordPress and Oxygen Builder suggests a moderate digital maturity level. The company appears to maintain a focused, professional presence but could improve by expanding transparency and business information online.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which limits readiness for security events. The missing WHOIS data reduces domain trust and raises questions about registration legitimacy. No signs of malware or vulnerabilities were found, but the site would benefit from enhanced security policies and technical controls to improve its security posture and compliance with GDPR and related regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve website security and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A.M.I. – Analytical Medical Instruments, s. r. o.
Description
Webové stránky A.M.I. – Analytical Medical Instruments, s. r. o. jsou určeny výhradně odborníkům dle zákona č. 40/1995 Sb. o regulaci reklamy ve znění pozdějších předpisů.
Key services
Provision of analytical medical instruments, Distribution of healthcare and diagnostic medical devices
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Fonts, Oxygen Builder
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. Content is targeted exclusively at healthcare professionals with legal disclaimers.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with clear user options.
  5. No privacy policy page explicitly found, but cookie policy is linked via PDF.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. Website uses WordPress with Oxygen builder and Yoast SEO plugin.
  8. No social media links or business contact details found in the HTML content.
  9. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Oxygen Builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a contemporary tech stack suitable for content management and SEO optimization. Google Fonts and jQuery are used for styling and interactivity. The site is mobile responsive and loads with moderate performance. However, no hosting provider information is discernible from the content. The absence of security headers and limited privacy documentation indicate areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and transparency to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amimedical.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amimedical.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.