Skip to main content

Security report for amiblu.com

Amiblu Group · Energy · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amiblu Group operates as the world's largest producer and technology partner for GRP (glass-fiber reinforced plastics) pipe systems, focusing on sustainable water infrastructure solutions. The company targets urban and rural communities, industries, and infrastructure planners, offering a broad portfolio of pipe products, technical documentation, and reference databases. Their market position is strong, supported by certifications such as EcoVadis and partnerships like the UNESCO World Engineering Day 2025. The website reflects a mature, well-established business with a professional and consistent brand presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including caching and multilingual support. However, performance is moderate and accessibility is basic. The site lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security flaw. Security headers are minimal, and no advanced security policies are implemented. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols, exposing users to potential risks. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available. The domain registration is consistent and mature, supporting the legitimacy of the business. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements to protect users and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amiblu.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amiblu Group's business intelligence reveals a strong market position in the energy and transportation sectors, specializing in GRP pipe manufacturing and technology partnerships. Their business model focuses on product innovation, sustainability, and global reach, supported by a comprehensive online product catalog and reference database. The company leverages partnerships and certifications to enhance credibility. Growth indicators include active content updates and participation in global engineering initiatives. The multilingual website and social media presence indicate a broad international target audience. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to improve digital security and privacy compliance to align with industry best practices.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is low due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, which is a critical vulnerability. The site does not implement modern TLS protocols, HSTS, or OCSP stapling, and security headers are minimal. No explicit incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms raises GDPR compliance concerns. While no active vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the fundamental lack of HTTPS significantly undermines user data protection and trust. Immediate remediation is required to secure communications and improve overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire website.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and configure HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  6. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  7. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  8. Enhance accessibility features and optimize performance for faster load times and better user experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.1 with a combination of plugins including WPML for multilingual support, Autoptimize for asset optimization, and W3 Total Cache with Redis for caching. The front-end uses jQuery 3.7.1 and MediaElement.js for media playback. Hosting appears to be on a dedicated or VPS server with Apache as the web server. Despite caching mechanisms, performance metrics are not reported, indicating potential monitoring gaps. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, the lack of HTTPS and modern security configurations represents a significant technical risk. Opportunities exist to modernize the SSL/TLS setup, improve accessibility compliance, and enhance performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amiblu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amiblu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.