Skip to main content

Security report for amelang-kollegen.de

Amelang · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amelang und Kollegen is a small insurance brokerage and consulting firm based in Berlin, Germany, offering a wide range of insurance and financial services including cyber protection, occupational disability insurance, and construction financing. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins such as WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a digitally mature infrastructure. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, uses HTTPS, and integrates SEO best practices via Yoast. However, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. WHOIS data is minimal and domain status is unusual, which slightly reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the business presents a credible online presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amelang-kollegen.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
45
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention amelang-kollegen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for amelang-kollegen.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets both private individuals and commercial clients in Berlin, focusing on insurance and financial consulting. Its business model revolves around brokerage and advisory services, leveraging partnerships with external insurance and tariff comparison platforms. The website content is relevant and well-structured, supporting the company's market positioning as a local expert with an online presence. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site is a minor gap. The use of affiliate and partner links suggests additional revenue streams. The company maintains consistent branding and professional content quality.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable WordPress plugins, which contributes to a solid security baseline. However, the absence of security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which is recommended for transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and technical headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers labeled for support or sales.
  4. Create and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure page or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amelang
Description
Beraten und Begleiten in Versicherungen, Finanzierungen, Datenschutz. DSGVO und Cyberschutz. Erhalte mitten in Berlin Beratung und Begleitung in all deinen Versicherungsthemen. Egal, ob Privatperson oder Gewerbekunde. In unserem Netzwerk haben wir Spezialisten für viele Bereiche.
Key services
Insurance consulting, Online insurance advice, Insurance check, Cyber protection insurance, Riester pension, Occupational disability insurance, Home and property insurance, Vehicle insurance, Gold investment advice, Construction financing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.7.12, WooCommerce 4.8.0, LayerSlider 6.11.2, Slider Revolution 6.2.23, WPBakery Page Builder, Elementor 3.0.16, Yoast SEO 18.4.1, jQuery
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (inferred from 1and1 plugin)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats (stats.wp.com)
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, WooCommerce German Market plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on insurance and financial consulting services in Berlin, Germany.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page or linked menus.
  4. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers are not explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Use of multiple WordPress plugins and modern web technologies indicates a maintained site.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. No adult or NSFW content detected.
  8. External links mostly point to partner or related insurance service providers.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  10. No data protection officer contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.7.12 with WooCommerce 4.8.0 and uses popular page builders like Elementor and WPBakery, along with advanced slider plugins. It loads Google Fonts and uses jQuery libraries. Hosting is likely provided by 1&1 IONOS, inferred from plugin usage. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with Yoast SEO integration. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the business's online presence effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amelang-kollegen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amelang-kollegen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.