Skip to main content

Security report for amber.aero

Amber Aero, SIA · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amber Aero, SIA is a Latvian-based technology company specializing in Passenger Service Systems (PSS) for the airline industry. Their platform is NDC-based and e-retail driven, targeting network, low-cost, and hybrid carriers to enable digital transformation and enhance retail capabilities. The company presents itself as a Baltic innovation with a focus on scalable, cloud and AI-based airline retail technology solutions. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and integrates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager and AmoCRM for marketing and lead capture. However, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but missing advanced security headers and DNSSEC. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy. Overall, Amber Aero positions itself as a niche airline technology provider with a solid digital presence but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of amber.aero. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amber.aero

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amber Aero operates in the transportation and technology sectors, focusing on airline Passenger Service Systems leveraging NDC standards. Their business model is B2B SaaS, offering APIs, customizable booking engines, agent portals, and integration with GDS and MSE systems. The company targets airlines seeking digital transformation and enhanced retailing capabilities. Market positioning is that of an innovative Baltic startup founded in 2020, with a small company size. The website content and WHOIS data confirm the company's legitimacy and regional focus. The use of Google Ads and AmoCRM indicates active marketing and lead generation efforts. The absence of phone contacts and social media presence suggests a focus on direct business engagements rather than broad consumer outreach.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and AmoCRM forms introduces typical web tracking and data collection risks but is standard for marketing purposes. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Amber Aero, SIA
Registration number
50203278461
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amber Aero, SIA
Description
NDC based E-Retail driven Passenger Service System enabling digital transformation and boosting retailing capabilities for network, low-cost and hybrid carriers.
Key services
NDC API, Customizable IBE & Mobile App, Agent B2B Portal, GDS EDIFACT Links, Seamless MSE Integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Condensed), Google Tag Manager, AmoCRM forms integration, Swiper.js slider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://amber.aero/)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
AmoCRM forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site focused on airline Passenger Service System technology
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  4. Contact information includes company email and physical address in Latvia
  5. No phone numbers or social media links explicitly provided
  6. Use of Google Ads and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information published
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy of the business
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with jQuery 3.5.1 and uses Google Fonts for typography. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google Ads for marketing conversions. AmoCRM forms are embedded for lead capture. The site uses Swiper.js for interactive sliders. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and robots tags but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved SEO metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 39/100High37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amber.aero. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amber.aero.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.