Skip to main content

Security report for amber.aero

Amber Aero, SIA · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amber Aero, SIA is a Latvian-based technology company specializing in providing an NDC-based Passenger Service System (PSS) designed to enable digital transformation and enhance retailing capabilities for airlines, including network, low-cost, and hybrid carriers. Their offerings include bespoke distribution solutions such as NDC API, customizable IBE and mobile applications, agent B2B portals, and GDS EDIFACT links, positioning them as an innovative player in the airline technology sector. The company emphasizes cloud and AI-based technologies to modernize airline retailing and distribution. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with jQuery and integrates Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads conversion tracking, and AmoCRM forms for lead capture. The site is mobile-optimized with a moderate performance profile and basic SEO and accessibility features. While HTTPS is enabled and domain registration is consistent and transparent, the site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and does not publish explicit security or incident response policies. From a security perspective, Amber Aero demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS and domain transfer protection but should improve by enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, and publishing security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no privacy policy or terms of service pages found. Contact information is available via corporate email and contact form, but no phone numbers or social media links are provided. Overall, Amber Aero presents as a legitimate, small-sized technology provider with a professional web presence and clear business focus. To enhance trust and compliance, the company should address privacy policy publication, security best practices, and incident response transparency. These improvements will strengthen their security posture and regulatory compliance, supporting their growth in the competitive airline technology market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amber.aero

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amber Aero operates in the niche market of airline Passenger Service Systems, leveraging NDC standards to offer modern retailing and distribution solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in combining airline operational knowledge with IT and retail expertise, enabling tailored cloud and AI-driven products. The business model focuses on B2B technology services for airlines, targeting network, low-cost, and hybrid carriers seeking digital transformation. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, API access, and customization services. The company is relatively new (founded 2020) and based in Latvia, positioning itself as a Baltic innovation hub. The partnership ecosystem includes integration with AmoCRM for customer engagement and Google Ads for marketing. Strategic observations suggest a focus on bespoke, scalable solutions with openness and integrability as key values, aiming to grow with the airline community.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided, indicating limited incident response readiness. The use of third-party scripts (Google Tag Manager, AmoCRM) introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no privacy policy or terms of service, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security culture appears nascent, with room for improvement in transparency, policy publication, and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and forms for vulnerabilities and data privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Amber Aero, SIA
Registration number
50203278461
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amber Aero, SIA
Description
Amber Aero provides an NDC-based Passenger Service System (PSS) focused on enabling digital transformation and boosting retailing capabilities for network, low-cost, and hybrid carriers. The company offers bespoke distribution solutions including NDC API, customizable IBE & Mobile App, Agent B2B Portal, GDS EDIFACT Links, and seamless MSE integrations.
Key services
NDC API, Customizable IBE & Mobile App, Agent B2B Portal, GDS EDIFACT Links, Seamless MSE Integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, AmoCRM forms integration, Swiper.js slider
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
AmoCRM forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a small airline technology provider.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. Contact information includes corporate email and a contact form but no phone number.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of Google Ads and tracking scripts indicates marketing efforts but limited privacy transparency.
  7. No social media links are active or visible on the site.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent with no privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with jQuery and integrates several third-party services such as Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, and AmoCRM forms. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, with large images and slider components that may impact load times. The technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites but lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC and security headers. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. There is an opportunity to modernize by optimizing images, improving accessibility, and enhancing SEO with structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 41/100High37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amber.aero. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amber.aero.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.