Skip to main content

Security report for ambar.lv

AMBAR · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AMBAR is a small Latvian company specializing in self-storage solutions with multiple locations in Riga. Their business model focuses on providing secure, flexible storage units for personal and business use, complemented by additional services such as moving assistance and loading/unloading support. The website is modern, multilingual, and designed to facilitate easy reservations and customer contact. Technically, the site uses React, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google Maps API, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS implied and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent and privacy policies present. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ambar.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AMBAR operates in the real estate sector focusing on storage rental services in Riga, Latvia. Their competitive advantage lies in offering 24/7 access, video surveillance, and mobile app-based access control. The business targets both individuals and small to medium enterprises needing storage solutions. Revenue streams likely include rental fees and ancillary services like transportation and loading assistance. The company maintains a localized presence with three physical locations and a digital booking platform. Partnerships with kinnovis.com for unit reservations indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Growth potential exists in expanding service offerings and enhancing digital marketing. The website content and structure support clear customer engagement and service promotion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No dedicated security or incident response pages or contacts were found, limiting transparency. The use of third-party scripts (Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel) introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced controls, policy disclosures, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights in privacy documentation.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to foster responsible security reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AMBAR
Description
AMBAR piedāvā drošas un uzticamas pašapkalpošanās noliktavas Rīgā ar elastīgiem nomas nosacījumiem un piekļuvi 24/7. Piedāvā arī mantu pārvadāšanu un krāvēju pakalpojumus.
Key services
pašapkalpošanās noliktavas, mantu pārvadāšana, iekraušanas un izkraušanas pakalpojumi, komerctelpu īre
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Maps API
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM implied), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a modern SPA with localized language support (lv, en, ru).
  2. Clear business focus on self-storage services in Riga, Latvia.
  3. Multiple physical locations and contact details provided.
  4. Cookie consent banner present with allow/deny/manage options.
  5. No visible forms collecting personal data on main page.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. Use of Google Maps API for location display.
  9. Use of Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built as a single-page application likely using React, supported by modern JavaScript and CSS assets. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, and Google Maps API for location services. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and localized content in Latvian, English, and Russian. Performance appears moderate with deferred script loading and optimized images. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of visible security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ambar.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ambar.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.