Skip to main content

Security report for amateurporn.co

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AmateurPorn.co is an adult entertainment website specializing in free streaming of amateur and homemade porn videos submitted by users. The site targets adult viewers interested in authentic, user-generated adult content. It operates on an ad-supported business model, leveraging multiple third-party ad networks to monetize traffic. The website's market position is niche, focusing on amateur content rather than professional productions. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and integrates advertising and analytics scripts including Google Tag Manager and ExoClick. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS for secure connections, but lacks comprehensive security headers and advanced privacy compliance mechanisms. The WHOIS data is fully redacted, which is common in adult content domains but reduces transparency and trust. Overall, the site provides accessible content with basic user experience but has limited business credibility and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amateurporn.co

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
35
Email security
40
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector with a focus on amateur content, appealing to a specific adult audience segment. Its business model is primarily advertising-based, with no visible direct sales or subscription services. The site maintains partnerships or affiliations with multiple similar adult content domains, indicating a networked ecosystem for content sharing or cross-promotion. The lack of visible company information, contact details, or certifications limits its business credibility. Growth indicators are not evident from the data, and the site appears to be a small-scale operation. The partnership ecosystem is extensive within the adult niche but lacks transparency. Strategic observations suggest the site could improve trust and compliance to enhance market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and an age verification overlay to comply with legal requirements. However, the absence of standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and content injection. The heavy reliance on third-party ad networks and scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No incident response or security policy information is available, indicating limited security governance. The WHOIS privacy protection is typical for adult sites but reduces transparency. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanisms detected. Overall, the security maturity is basic and could benefit from enhanced controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Introduce a clear and accessible cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance and user trust.
  3. Enhance age verification processes to ensure robust compliance with legal requirements for adult content.
  4. Publish transparent contact and business information to improve credibility and facilitate incident response.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party ad scripts and tracking technologies to reduce risk exposure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
AMATEURPORN: Discover thousands of amateur porn videos and real home sex clips submitted daily by real naughty user for 100% free unlimited viewing!
Key services
Streaming amateur porn videos, User submissions, Free unlimited viewing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, ExoClick ads, Google Tag Manager, SVG graphics, AJAX, Cookie management, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification overlay implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
ExoClick, PEM Ad Network, Magnet Ad Network
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts free amateur adult videos with user-submitted content
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers for business
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are minimal or absent
  4. Heavy use of third-party ad networks and tracking scripts
  5. No explicit security headers detected
  6. Age verification overlay present but basic
  7. WHOIS data is fully redacted, limiting ownership transparency
  8. Site uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries
  9. Content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard HTML5 structure with responsive CSS and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox for UI components. It integrates multiple third-party advertising networks and tracking services, including ExoClick and Google Analytics, which may impact performance and privacy. The site is mobile-optimized with a viewport meta tag and responsive stylesheets. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images implemented. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO metadata beyond basic tags. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears moderate, with opportunities to modernize security and privacy features to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amateurporn.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amateurporn.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.