Skip to main content

Security report for amateurhomevids.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AmateurHomeVids is an adult content aggregator website that provides access to various amateur home videos through affiliate links to multiple external adult sites. The site targets adult users interested in amateur adult entertainment and monetizes primarily through advertising and affiliate marketing. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with standard plugins and scripts, including jQuery and Font Awesome, and integrates advertising networks such as ExoClick. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, with no detected security headers or HTTPS enforcement information, and no visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating poor compliance with privacy regulations. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency, which negatively impacts business credibility. Overall, the website operates in a niche adult media market but exhibits significant gaps in security, privacy compliance, and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amateurhomevids.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche player in the adult entertainment industry, focusing on amateur home videos aggregated from various partner sites. Its business model relies heavily on affiliate marketing and advertising revenue, linking out to numerous external adult domains. The lack of clear business information, contact details, and privacy policies suggests a low level of corporate transparency. The site appears to be small in scale with basic content quality and moderate branding consistency. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating diverse amateur content, but it lacks trust signals and professional business presentation. Growth potential may be limited by regulatory compliance issues and security weaknesses.

Security posture

The security posture of AmateurHomeVids is weak. The site lacks essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or HSTS, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing man-in-the-middle attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site uses multiple external scripts and affiliate links, which could introduce vulnerabilities if not properly managed. Incident response and security policies are not found, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. Overall, the site poses a moderate security risk to users and operators.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance mechanisms.
  4. Provide verifiable contact information and establish incident response procedures.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website providing adult amateur home video content with various categories and tags related to adult entertainment.
Key services
Adult video content aggregation, Affiliate linking to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Google Fonts (Roboto), ExoClick Ads, VeriSign Whois (for domain registry)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
ExoClick
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing jQuery 3.7.1 and Font Awesome 4.7.0 for UI elements. It loads Google Fonts and integrates advertising scripts from ExoClick and affiliate networks. The site demonstrates moderate mobile optimization and basic SEO practices. However, there is no evidence of advanced performance optimization or accessibility features. The technical infrastructure appears standard for a small-scale affiliate site but lacks modern security and privacy enhancements. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, and no CDN or WAF protections are detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amateurhomevids.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amateurhomevids.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.