Skip to main content

Is amark.com a Scam? Security Check Results - A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.

amark.com Security Report Summary

amark.com received a security score of 55 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.'s website security posture. A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. operates in the Finance industry in N/a.

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. operates a professional website focused on precious metals trading and distribution, including gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. The company targets investors and financial institutions seeking precious metals investment opportunities. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, indicating a mature e-commerce infrastructure. The presence of a cookie consent banner and privacy policy demonstrates attention to privacy compliance, particularly GDPR. However, no explicit contact information or detailed security policies are publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which raises some concerns but does not negate the professional appearance and functionality of the site.

The security scan identified 34 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: WordPress, WooCommerce, WPBakery Page Builder, FontAwesome, Osano Consent Management.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

amark.com favicon

Is amark.com Safe? Security Analysis for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.

https://www.amark.com/

Check if amark.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/alarge
WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderFontAwesomeOsano Consent Management
Analyzed Completed
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Below Finance avg (78)

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for amark.com

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. operates a professional website focused on precious metals trading and distribution, including gold, silver, platinum, and palladium. The company targets investors and financial institutions seeking precious metals investment opportunities. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, indicating a mature e-commerce infrastructure. The presence of a cookie consent banner and privacy policy demonstrates attention to privacy compliance, particularly GDPR. However, no explicit contact information or detailed security policies are publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which raises some concerns but does not negate the professional appearance and functionality of the site.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderFontAwesomeOsano Consent Management

12 urgent findings need attention

12 high

  • + 4 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep amark.com under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for amark.com.

OffSeq Observations

No critical findings yet

79/100

DNS Health

2 findings

85/100

SSL/TLS Security

6 findings

37/100

Email Security

5 findings

65/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a significant player in the precious metals market, offering trading and distribution services. The business model revolves around facilitating precious metals transactions for institutional and retail clients. The website's design and content suggest a large enterprise with a focus on trust and professionalism. The lack of visible contact details on the homepage may indicate a controlled client engagement approach, possibly requiring login or direct contact through other channels. The company appears to maintain a clean digital footprint with no obvious third-party partnerships or subsidiaries listed on the site.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline security and privacy practices. However, the absence of visible security headers and public security policies suggests room for improvement in security transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a security.txt file or incident response contact information limits the ability for external parties to report security issues effectively. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and public disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.

Description:

A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.

Key Services:
Precious metals tradingDistribution of gold, silver, platinum, palladium
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWooCommerceWPBakery Page BuilderFontAwesomeOsano Consent Management
Frameworks:
WooCommerce
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Osano Consent Management
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the amark.com security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete amark.com security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:149.97.246.199 include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.constantcontact.com include:mailgun.org include:spf.zohomail360.com ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:[email protected]
Forensic Reports:[email protected]

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

37/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1033 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:149.97.246.213
Name Servers:
dns1.easydns.com
dns2.easydns.net
dns3.easydns.org
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 1781717727, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:42ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:149.97.246.199 include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:spf.constantcontact.com include:mailgun.org include:spf.zohomail360.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does amark.com compare?

See how amark.com stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and WPBakery Page Builder for content management. It uses standard web fonts from Google Fonts and FontAwesome icons. The site includes Osano for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is standard for e-commerce sites but could be enhanced with additional security and performance optimizations.
Professional Report

Download the amark.com report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Scan your own website

Liked the amark.com report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about amark.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website