Skip to main content

Security report for amari.com

Amari · Hospitality · Thailand

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amari Hotels & Resorts is a hospitality company operating multiple hotels and resorts primarily in Thailand and across Asia. The website offers direct booking capabilities, a loyalty rewards program, and multilingual support, positioning itself as a regional hospitality brand focused on delivering culturally rich and personalized guest experiences. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and various analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and some security headers present, though additional headers and explicit security policies could enhance protection. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain www.amari.com raises concerns about domain legitimacy and reduces overall trustworthiness. No direct contact emails or phone numbers were found in the provided content, which may impact business credibility. Overall, the website is professional, user-friendly, and safe for general audiences, but domain registration verification and enhanced contact transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amari.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amari Hotels & Resorts holds a solid market position as a medium-sized hospitality brand with multiple properties in Asia, targeting travelers seeking culturally immersive and comfortable accommodations. The business model centers on direct online bookings and a loyalty program (ONYX Rewards) to drive customer retention. The website integrates with third-party booking engines and marketing platforms, indicating strategic partnerships that support its operations. The multilingual site and regional focus suggest a broad target audience across Asia. The lack of visible contact information and missing WHOIS data may hinder customer trust and operational transparency. The company appears to invest in digital marketing and analytics to optimize customer engagement and conversion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and a Content Security Policy to upgrade insecure requests. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used, which increases the attack surface but no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML. Security headers like Strict-Transport-Security and X-Frame-Options are absent and should be added to improve defense against common web attacks. No public security or incident response policies were found, which is a gap in transparency and preparedness. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with enhanced headers, public security policies, and domain registration verification.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trust.
  2. Add additional security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Provide clear and accessible company contact information including emails and phone numbers on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and reduce attack surface.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amari
Description
Amari Hotels & Resorts operates a chain of hotels and resorts primarily in Thailand and across Asia, offering hospitality services that emphasize local culture, design, and personalized guest experiences.
Key services
Hotel accommodations, Resort stays, Online booking, Loyalty rewards program (ONYX Rewards)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.3.1, HotelDatepicker, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Flickity carousel, FancyBox, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, International Telephone Input
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form handling with POST

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick, Bing Ads, Brand Display
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Marketing tools
The Hotels Network
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive booking features.
  2. No WHOIS data available, raising questions about domain registration status.
  3. Strong use of third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies publicly visible.
  7. Website uses HTTPS with good security headers but could improve with additional headers.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery, and various UI and animation libraries such as AOS and Flickity. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and affiliate tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and lazy loading images for performance. Booking functionality is implemented with a custom datepicker and autocomplete search for properties, integrating with external booking engines. The site uses HTTPS with a basic Content Security Policy but lacks some advanced security headers. Performance is moderate with many external scripts loaded asynchronously. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amari.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amari.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.