Skip to main content

Security report for amanespa.lv

Amanespa · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amanespa is a small beauty and massage studio based in Riga, Latvia, offering a variety of wellness services including massages, hairdressing, manicure, body treatments, and workshops. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, and integrates third-party services like Google Maps and Tawk.to live chat to enhance user experience. The site supports multiple languages (English, Latvian, Russian) targeting a broad local and visiting audience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and secure forms, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policy documentation. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image for a local hospitality business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amanespa.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector focusing on beauty and wellness services. Its business model centers on direct service provision to individual customers, including personalized massages, hairdressing, and workshops. The website content and structure indicate a focus on customer engagement and local market presence. The absence of privacy and terms policies suggests room for compliance improvement. The partnership with webdev.lv for development indicates professional support. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position with a clear service offering and local reputation.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and secure contact forms, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published privacy policy and incident response information indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. The use of third-party scripts like Tawk.to introduces some risk but is common for live chat functionality. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amanespa
Description
Beauty & Massage Studio offering full body and facial treatments, massages, hairdresser services, manicure, other spa and body treatments, workshops, and outdoor activities located in Riga, Latvia.
Key services
Classic massage, Therapeutic massage, Back massage, Anti-stress massage, Haircuts and hairdressing, Manicure, Facial treatments, Body treatments, SPA procedures, Nail care
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.2.4, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Tawk.to live chat
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of cookie consent banner
  • Use of secure contact forms with validation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tawk.to
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional small business site for a beauty and massage studio in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and multilingual support (EN, LV, RU).
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, physical address, and contact forms.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating some privacy awareness.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML source.
  7. Use of third-party live chat (Tawk.to) and Google Maps integration.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.2.4 with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Yoast SEO for optimization. It uses Contact Form 7 for data collection and integrates Google Maps API and Tawk.to live chat for enhanced user interaction. The site is mobile-optimized and has good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. No hosting provider details were found. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy documentation, indicating technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amanespa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amanespa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.