Skip to main content

Security report for aluksnesslimnica.lv

SIA "Alūksnes slimnīca" · Healthcare · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Alūksnes slimnīca is a regional healthcare provider in Latvia offering 24/7 inpatient and outpatient medical services across multiple specialties including therapy, neurology, surgery, traumatology, obstetrics-gynecology, and pediatrics. The hospital has a capacity of 67 beds distributed among various departments and provides acute rehabilitation and secondary outpatient care during normal working hours. The website content is primarily in Latvian and targets patients and healthcare consumers in the region. Technically, the website uses basic HTML5, CSS, and jQuery with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and accessibility but lacks advanced SEO and performance optimizations. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent or GDPR explicit statements. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional but basic, with room for improvement in security, privacy, and technical sophistication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aluksnesslimnica.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aluksnesslimnica.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aluksnesslimnica.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hospital operates as an essential healthcare entity serving a regional market in Latvia. Its business model focuses on providing urgent and planned inpatient care alongside outpatient services. The lack of visible contact details and limited digital presence suggests a traditional operational model with limited online engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The absence of analytics and marketing tools indicates minimal digital marketing efforts. The organization appears stable but could benefit from enhanced digital transformation to improve patient engagement and trust.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic and lacks several best practices. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy compliance statements indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency. The website does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the provided content, but the lack of security controls is a concern for a healthcare provider handling sensitive information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish clear contact information including phone numbers and emails for patient support and security incident reporting.
  5. Consider adding a security policy and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Alūksnes slimnīca"
Description
SIA Alūksnes slimnīca provides urgent inpatient and planned medical care 24/7 in therapy, neurology, surgery, traumatology, obstetrics-gynecology, and pediatrics. It has 67 beds across various departments including intensive care and rehabilitation. Secondary outpatient health services are also offered during normal working hours.
Key services
Emergency inpatient care, Planned inpatient care, Therapy, Neurology, Surgery, Traumatology, Obstetrics and gynecology, Pediatrics, Acute rehabilitation, Secondary outpatient services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website content is in Latvian with some English meta tags.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; no contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found.
  5. Privacy policy page exists but cookie policy and terms of service are missing.
  6. No social media links or external domains found in navigation or content.
  7. Uses jQuery and custom JavaScript files; no modern frameworks detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  10. Content is healthcare related, safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and jQuery. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern JavaScript frameworks. The site structure is simple with clear navigation but limited SEO and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization. The lack of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection and user tracking. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aluksnesslimnica.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aluksnesslimnica.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.