Skip to main content

Security report for alspruvodce.cz

ALSA, z.s. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ALSA, z.s. operates a community portal dedicated to supporting individuals diagnosed with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in the Czech Republic. The organization provides valuable services including patient counseling, equipment rental, rehabilitation programs, and educational events, positioning itself as a unique non-profit entity in the Czech and Slovak regions. The website reflects a clear mission to assist ALS patients and their families by offering timely and relevant information and fostering community connections. Technically, the site is built on a modern React and Next.js framework hosted by a Czech provider, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and direct contact information, which are areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency to align with best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of alspruvodce.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alspruvodce.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization targets a niche healthcare segment focusing on ALS patients and their caregivers, operating as a small non-profit with a community-driven business model. Its competitive advantage lies in being the sole specialized ALS support entity in the Czech and Slovak markets, offering comprehensive patient services and educational resources. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and possibly service fees for equipment rental or rehabilitation stays. The partnership ecosystem includes the OMS Foundation and Cleevio, the latter providing technical development support. Growth indicators include active event hosting and community engagement via social media. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital presence with enhanced privacy and security features to build further trust and compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic, with no HTTPS enforcement or security headers explicitly detected in the HTML content. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, or vulnerability disclosure information, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of direct contact channels for security incidents reduces incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. The security culture appears limited to basic website protections, and improvements are needed to elevate the security posture to industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced site-wide with a valid SSL certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS.
  4. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Provide clear contact information including dedicated security and incident response email addresses to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ALSA, z.s.
Description
ALSA is a community portal for people with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), providing information, support, and services such as counseling, equipment rental, rehabilitation programs, and educational events.
Key services
Patient counseling and consultations, Specialized equipment rental, Rehabilitation and educational stays, Outreach by specialists to patients' homes, Information dissemination and community building
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Contact information is limited to social media links; no direct email or phone contact found.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage; login and registration links exist but no form details available.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses modern React/Next.js framework with preloading and code splitting.
  7. Content is focused on ALS patient support and community engagement.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected in the provided HTML.
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  10. Branding is consistent with ALSA logos and color scheme.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern React and Next.js technology stack, enabling server-side rendering and efficient code splitting for performance optimization. Google Fonts are used for typography, and images are served responsively with srcset attributes. Hosting is provided by WEDOS, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the target audience. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and user experience design. However, there is no evidence of advanced SEO optimization or accessibility features beyond basic implementation. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection, which aligns with privacy considerations but limits marketing insights. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and privacy mechanisms represents a modernization opportunity to meet current web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 57/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alspruvodce.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alspruvodce.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.