Skip to main content

Security report for alpinoperle.lv

Alpino Pērle · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alpino Pērle is a healthcare provider based in Riga, Latvia, offering a broad range of medical services including specialist consultations, diagnostics, vaccinations, and procedural care. The practice targets local patients, including expectant mothers and children, emphasizing personalized care and a comfortable environment. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Webflow, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and explicit security policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent and GDPR notices present but no detailed privacy or security policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its healthcare audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alpinoperle.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small healthcare practice specializing in multiple medical disciplines, leveraging partnerships such as with piearsta.lv for appointment scheduling. Its business model includes both state-funded and paid services, with a focus on patient-centric care. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and contact options, aiding patient engagement. The presence of tracking and marketing tools suggests an interest in digital outreach and patient acquisition. The company appears well-positioned locally with consistent branding and a clear value proposition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the absence of key security headers and explicit security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is standard but should be monitored for privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the content or scripts. The lack of WHOIS data limits full domain trust assessment but the overall digital footprint suggests legitimacy.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish detailed privacy and security policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Consider enabling DNSSEC to improve domain security.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize attack surface.
  5. Establish an incident response contact or page to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alpino Pērle
Description
Ārstu prakse Rīgas centrā piedāvā plašu medicīnas speciālistu konsultāciju un izmeklējumu klāstu, tostarp pediatriju, uroloģiju, ginekoloģiju un gastroenteroloģiju. Mērķis ir saglabāt un uzlabot pacientu veselību, nodrošinot individuālu pieeju un ērtu vidi.
Key services
Medicīnas speciālistu konsultācijas, Ultrasonogrāfijas izmeklējumi, Vakcinācija, Procedūru kabinets, Attālinātas konsultācijas, Mājas vizītes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, Google Fonts
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with anonymize IP enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  4. Clear contact phone and WhatsApp links provided.
  5. Cookie consent banner present and GDPR compliance indicated.
  6. No privacy policy page explicitly found but cookie policy and GDPR notice present.
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  8. No email addresses explicitly found in HTML content.
  9. No explicit forms detected except appointment form link.
  10. Multiple external scripts for analytics and tracking used.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external resources. No CMS other than Webflow is detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely Webflow's infrastructure. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and functional user experience with opportunities for security and performance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alpinoperle.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alpinoperle.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.