Skip to main content

Security report for alpex.lv

SIA Alpex · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Alpex operates as a specialized service provider offering 24/7 technical maintenance and emergency services for building engineering communications in Latvia. The company targets property owners and businesses requiring reliable building technical support. The website reflects a small-sized local business with a clear focus on technical service delivery. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging modern plugins such as Yoast SEO for optimization, Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and bot protection in place, although explicit security headers and detailed security policies are absent. Privacy compliance is well addressed through Cookiebot consent mechanisms and a comprehensive cookie declaration in Latvian. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, suitable for its business purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alpex.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself in the energy sector, focusing on building technical services and emergency repairs. Its business model revolves around providing continuous technical support and maintenance, likely generating revenue through service contracts and emergency call-outs. The website content and structure indicate a focus on local clientele in Latvia, with multilingual support for Latvian, Russian, and English. The absence of social media links or extensive contact details suggests a direct business-to-business approach rather than broad consumer marketing. The use of Cookiebot and Google services indicates awareness of regulatory and security requirements. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse, reflecting a baseline security maturity. Cookie consent management via Cookiebot ensures GDPR compliance in data collection practices. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could impact preparedness and transparency. The contact form collects personal data with user consent, but no additional security measures or data protection officer contacts are provided. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response documentation to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add clear terms of service and privacy policy pages linked in the main navigation for user trust and compliance.
  4. Obtain and display verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Consider registering and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Alpex
Description
24H ēku tehniskais serviss
Key services
24/7 building technical service, Internal and external engineering communications maintenance, Emergency situation resolution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Swiper.js, FancyBox, Cookiebot, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • Google reCAPTCHA used to prevent bots
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and SEO optimization
  2. Cookiebot is used for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management
  3. Google reCAPTCHA is implemented for bot protection
  4. Contact form collects personal data with explicit user consent checkbox
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages linked in navigation
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. No social media links or company emails explicitly found in HTML
  9. Phone numbers not explicitly labeled or found with clear context
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Yoast SEO plugin version 24.0, indicating a modern CMS environment optimized for search engines. It uses external libraries such as Swiper.js for sliders and FancyBox for modals, enhancing user interface interactivity. Cookiebot scripts manage cookie consent and compliance. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from reputable CDNs, supporting performance and reliability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. The absence of hosting provider information limits infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly website experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alpex.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alpex.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.