Skip to main content

Security report for allpaid.com

AllPaid · Finance · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

70/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AllPaid is a payment processing company established in 1999, providing merchant services and financial transaction solutions. The website presents a modern design using Bootstrap and Angular frameworks, hosted on AWS infrastructure. However, the site lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and does not provide visible contact information or social media links. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and DNSSEC. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, indicating a legitimate business with a long operational history.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      No Name Servers Found

      Unable to find name servers for domain

      What to do: Configure proper name servers for the domain

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allpaid.com

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
98
DNS health
60
Network security
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention allpaid.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
230
Employees
0
Customers
230
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
6%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for allpaid.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AllPaid operates in the finance sector focusing on payment processing services for businesses and merchants. The business model revolves around providing secure and efficient payment solutions. The company appears to be medium-sized with a stable market position. The lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials on the website suggests room for improvement in building customer confidence. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the provided data.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and has domain status protections in place, but lacks important security headers and DNSSEC. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published. No forms or inputs were detected to assess secure handling of user data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add clear contact information including dedicated security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  4. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Consider adding trust signals such as certifications, customer testimonials, and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AllPaid
Description
AllPaid provides payment processing and financial transaction services, focusing on secure and efficient payment solutions.
Key services
Payment processing, Merchant services, Financial transaction management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.0, ngx-bootstrap 5.6.1, Font Awesome 6.1.1, Angular (implied by ngx-bootstrap usage)
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern frontend technologies with Bootstrap and Angular components
  2. No visible privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage or linked pages
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  4. No social media links detected in the provided HTML content
  5. WHOIS data shows a long-established domain with stable registration
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled
  7. No forms with identifiable fields found in the truncated HTML content
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  9. External resources are loaded from reputable CDNs and AWS DNS servers
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5 and Angular components, served via reputable CDNs and hosted on AWS infrastructure. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks structured data markup and comprehensive metadata which could improve search engine visibility. No CMS was detected. Technical debt appears low but the absence of security headers and compliance documents represents a risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allpaid.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allpaid.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.