Skip to main content

Security report for allover30.com

AllOver30.com · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AllOver30.com operates as a niche adult entertainment website specializing in mature nude women content, offering subscription-based access to photo galleries and movies. The site targets adults over 30 and maintains a membership model with free previews to attract users. The business has been established since 2005, indicating a mature presence in the adult media industry. The website uses recognized payment processors and displays compliance badges such as RTA verification and 18 U.S.C. 2257 record-keeping statements, which support its legitimacy and regulatory adherence. Technically, the site employs a basic technology stack including jQuery and Google Analytics, with DNS hosted via Cloudflare. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but lacks modern security enhancements such as DNSSEC and security headers. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to basic, reflecting a dated but functional infrastructure. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and domain registration protections but is missing key security headers and DNSSEC, which could expose it to certain risks. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting transparency. The content is explicitly adult and NSFW, with clear age verification disclaimers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, DNS security, and privacy compliance. The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic recommendations include implementing DNSSEC, adding security headers, introducing cookie consent for compliance, improving mobile and accessibility features, and enhancing contact transparency to build trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allover30.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AllOver30.com holds a niche position in the adult entertainment market focusing on mature models, leveraging a subscription membership business model. Its competitive advantage lies in targeting a specific demographic (adults over 30) with specialized content. Revenue streams are primarily from membership fees processed through established payment gateways. The site maintains partnerships with affiliate networks and payment processors, indicating a structured ecosystem. Growth indicators are limited from the data but the domain age and consistent branding suggest stable operations. The business operates in the media sector with a small company size and no publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, indicating limited formal security governance. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers reduces transparency. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formalized policies and technical improvements to reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience.
  5. Provide clear company contact information to increase transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AllOver30.com
Description
Adult entertainment website specializing in mature nude women content, including pictures and movies targeting adults over 30.
Key services
Adult photo galleries, Adult movies, Membership access, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, jQuery 2.2.0, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Newsletter subscription form
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content membership site focused on mature models.
  2. Content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  3. Basic privacy and terms policies are present but cookie consent is missing.
  4. Security headers and DNSSEC are not implemented, representing moderate security risk.
  5. Uses recognized payment processors and compliance badges (RTA, 2257).
  6. Technical stack is basic with legacy jQuery and Google Analytics.
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via support form only.
  8. Website design and UX are functional but basic and dated.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack with jQuery 2.2.0 and Google Analytics for tracking. DNS is managed via Cloudflare but without DNSSEC enabled. The site lacks modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The HTML structure is functional but dated, with no detected CMS or modern frameworks. The site relies on external payment processors and affiliate networks for monetization. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and missing security best practices, presenting modernization opportunities to improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allover30.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allover30.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.