Skip to main content

Security report for allianzpflegeversorgung.ch

Allianz Pflegeversorgung · Healthcare · Switzerland

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Allianz Pflegeversorgung website represents a regional healthcare alliance coordinating nursing and care services for the municipalities of Dietlikon, Wallisellen, and Wangen-Brüttisellen in Switzerland. The alliance focuses on strategic planning, capacity management, and ensuring efficient and patient-centered care delivery. The website clearly communicates its mission and member organizations, providing contact details and links to partner care centers. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with standard plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Statistics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly but lacks published privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers are missing and incident response information is absent. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allianzpflegeversorgung.ch

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a healthcare coordination alliance serving three Swiss municipalities, positioning itself as a key regional player in integrated nursing care. Its competitive advantage lies in strategic coordination and synergy realization among multiple care providers. The business model is public-sector oriented, focusing on efficient resource use and patient placement rather than direct service provision. Revenue streams are likely municipal funding and healthcare budgets. Target customers are residents requiring nursing care and local government stakeholders. The alliance maintains partnerships with several care centers, enhancing its service network. Growth indicators include strategic planning and capacity optimization efforts. The website reflects a stable, small-sized organization with a clear regional focus.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, indicating limited transparency and preparedness communication. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also represents a compliance gap under GDPR. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public information site but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, publishing policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Add incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to facilitate vulnerability reporting and response.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear cookie consent mechanisms to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allianz Pflegeversorgung
Description
Die «Allianz Pflegeversorgung» der Gemeinden Dietlikon, Wallisellen und Wangen-Brüttisellen steuert, koordiniert und plant auf strategischer Ebene die Pflegeversorgung der drei Gemeinden. Sie stellt eine effektive und effiziente Leistungserbringung sicher, optimiert die Pflegeversorgungskette und strebt eine zukunftsorientierte und finanziell tragbare Pflegefinanzierung an.
Key services
Strategic planning and coordination of nursing care, Capacity planning, Patient placement and care optimization, Synergy realization among care providers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, WP Statistics plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Content is focused on healthcare coordination for three Swiss municipalities.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage for data collection.
  6. Use of WordPress CMS with common plugins and standard technologies.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No social media links found on the homepage.
  9. No security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, using Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Statistics for analytics. It loads jQuery 3.7.1 and uses Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization and webpage. Performance is moderate, with large images optimized via srcset. No advanced frameworks detected beyond WordPress core and plugins. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains basic standards. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allianzpflegeversorgung.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allianzpflegeversorgung.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.