Skip to main content

Security report for allianz-trade.de

Allianz Trade Deutschland · Finance · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allianz Trade Deutschland operates as a leading provider of trade credit insurance, sureties, guarantees, and fraud protection services, targeting businesses of all sizes including multinational corporations. The company is positioned as a worldwide market leader, formerly known as Euler Hermes, and is part of the Allianz Group. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear service offerings and a focus on protecting business cash flow and growth. Technically, the site is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern analytics and consent management tools, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and cookie consent, though explicit security policies and headers could be enhanced. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the brand, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allianz-trade.de

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a broad business audience, offering flexible insurance solutions tailored to company size and needs. Its competitive advantage lies in its global market leadership, extensive data resources (289 million companies in database), and strong financial stability (AA rating). The business model focuses on risk mitigation for trade receivables and contractual guarantees, generating revenue through insurance premiums and service fees. Partnerships with Allianz Group and integration with digital platforms like Allianz Trade Online enhance customer engagement and service delivery. The website supports lead generation via contact forms and premium calculators, indicating a mature digital marketing approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent via OneTrust, and use of reputable analytics platforms. However, there is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, and no explicit security headers found in the HTML source, which could be improved. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which is a gap in transparency. Overall, the site aligns with standard enterprise security practices but could enhance trust by publishing security policies and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information for data protection officer and incident response teams to comply with GDPR and build trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for improved user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allianz Trade Deutschland
Description
Allianz Trade supports business growth with trade credit insurance, sureties, guarantees, and protection against fraud.
Key services
Warenkreditversicherung (Trade Credit Insurance), Bürgschaften und Garantien (Sureties and Guarantees), Vertrauensschadenversicherung (Fidelity Insurance)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), jQuery, Adobe Launch (Tag Manager), OneTrust (Cookie Consent), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Adobe Analytics
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Adobe Analytics
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong branding consistent with Allianz Group.
  4. Cookie consent implemented via OneTrust.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  6. Contact information includes phone and contact forms but no direct email addresses visible.
  7. Use of modern Adobe Experience Manager CMS and analytics tools.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit data protection officer contact found.
  10. No visible security headers in HTML source; likely handled at server level.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS, and uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Adobe Launch for tag management. It integrates OneTrust for GDPR-compliant cookie consent and uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and preloading strategies. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and fonts. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely managed by Allianz's enterprise infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allianz-trade.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allianz-trade.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.