Skip to main content

Security report for allianz.cz

Allianz pojišťovna · Finance · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allianz pojišťovna is a Czech insurance company offering auto, property, life, and travel insurance products. It operates as part of the global Allianz Group, which serves over 80 million clients worldwide. The website is professionally designed, leveraging Adobe Experience Manager CMS and integrates multiple marketing and analytics technologies such as Adobe DTM, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. GDPR compliance is addressed through a cookie consent mechanism implemented via OneTrust. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though additional security headers and explicit privacy policies are not evident on the analyzed page. WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which is common for .cz domains but slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional digital presence for a large enterprise insurer in the Czech market.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of allianz.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allianz.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention allianz.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5,316
Employees
3
Customers
5,308
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
10%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 23 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for allianz.cz.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –adfs.allianz.cz2025-07-20
  • –adfs.allianz.cz2025-07-04
  • –adfs.allianz.cz2025-04-14

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the general public in the Czech Republic with a broad portfolio of insurance products. Being part of Allianz Group provides strong market positioning and brand recognition. The business model focuses on direct insurance sales and customer service through digital channels. The website's integration with advanced marketing and analytics tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. Absence of visible contact information and privacy policies on this page suggests these may be located elsewhere or require further navigation. The lack of WHOIS data is typical for the region but should be monitored for transparency. No suspicious domains or partners were identified in the analysis.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner consistent with GDPR requirements, indicating a baseline security and privacy posture. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided data, and no security policy or incident response information is publicly visible. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files, which are best practices for enterprise websites. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential privacy and security risks that should be managed carefully. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced header configurations and transparency about security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service accessible from all pages.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and compliance.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Ensure contact information including emails and phone numbers are clearly available to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allianz pojišťovna
Description
Allianz pojišťovna nabízí pojištění auta, majetku, života nebo dovolené. Je součástí koncernu Allianz Group s 80 milionů klientů ve více než 70 zemích.
Key services
auto insurance, property insurance, life insurance, travel insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe DTM, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, OneTrust Cookie Consent, jQuery
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM, OneTrust
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on this page.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, typical for .cz domains with privacy or registry restrictions.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links found on this page.
  7. Uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS and multiple marketing/analytics tools.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform. It uses modern marketing and analytics tools including Adobe DTM, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive images. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The HTML and CSS appear valid and SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable online presence but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100Low25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allianz.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allianz.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.