Skip to main content

Security report for allchange.org

Allchange · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allchange.org is a Russian-language online platform specializing in monitoring currency exchangers, including cryptocurrency and fiat currency exchange services. The website provides users with up-to-date exchange rates, user reviews, and ratings for over 400 exchangers, positioning itself as a niche leader in the currency exchange monitoring market. Founded in 2019, the platform targets users seeking reliable and current information on currency exchange services. Technically, the website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, and demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and some advanced security headers. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific indicators. Contact information is limited to contact forms and a Telegram support link, with no explicit company emails or phone numbers published. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy within its niche but could improve in privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allchange.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on currency exchange monitoring and user-generated reviews. Its business model revolves around providing a comprehensive catalog of exchangers with real-time rates and user feedback, likely monetized through advertising or affiliate partnerships, though no explicit ad networks or affiliate programs were detected. The target audience includes individuals and businesses involved in currency exchange, particularly in Russian-speaking regions. The website's market position is that of a specialized service with a medium-sized catalog of exchangers and a growing user base. The absence of detailed company registration data and contact emails suggests a small to medium enterprise with a focus on digital presence rather than traditional corporate transparency. The platform's partnership ecosystem is not evident from the data, indicating potential for growth in strategic alliances.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status flags to prevent unauthorized transfers. However, the lack of DNSSEC implementation and absence of advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or security.txt files indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site does not provide explicit incident response contacts or security policies, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent or GDPR-specific mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced DNS security, formal vulnerability disclosure policies, and improved privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Publish explicit contact emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  4. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Allchange
Description
Каталог надежных обменников с актуальным кусром валют на сегодня! Мониторинг обменников с отзывами и рейтингом от ALLCHANGE
Key services
Currency exchanger monitoring, Exchange rate listings, User reviews and ratings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Nuxt.js, Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Russian-language currency exchanger monitoring platform
  2. No privacy or cookie banners detected, but privacy policy page exists
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found, only contact forms
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML
  6. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Vue.js, Nuxt.js)
  7. Domain is registered with Tucows and uses Cloudflare DNS servers
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern JavaScript stack using Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS services, though not for CDN or WAF protection. The site shows good mobile optimization and SEO practices with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with preloaded scripts and stylesheets to improve loading times. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of common analytics or tracking scripts suggests a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing integration. Technical risks include the lack of DNSSEC and incomplete security header implementation, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allchange.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allchange.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.