Skip to main content

Security report for alidem.com

Alidem Srl · Hospitality · Italy

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alidem Srl is an Italian company specializing in beauty and design products and services, primarily targeting the hospitality sector, companies, and design professionals such as architects and interior designers. Their offerings include studio services, decorative products, and souvenirs, positioning them as a niche player in the design and hospitality market. The website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and frameworks, providing a good user experience with responsive design and clear navigation. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear professional and credible. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and explicit incident response or security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy and cookie policy present but no active consent mechanism. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security practices and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alidem.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
35
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alidem operates in the hospitality and design sectors, offering tailored products and services to hotels, companies, and design professionals. Their business model is B2B, focusing on aesthetic and decorative solutions. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and social media engagement. Market positioning is niche with a focus on quality and beauty in design. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern but may be due to privacy protection or recent registration. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company appears small in size with localized operations in Milan, Italy.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to enhance security. There is no public security policy or incident response information available, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism despite having a cookie policy indicates partial GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, policies, and consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy controls.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Alidem Srl
VAT number
IT09887650969
Registration number
REA MI-2119664
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alidem Srl
Description
Alidem is a company specializing in beauty and design products and services, targeting hotels, companies, and architects/interior designers. They offer studio services, products, and souvenirs with a focus on aesthetic and decorative solutions.
Key services
Alidem Studio, Alidem Prodotti, Alidem Souvenir
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Bootstrap 5.3.1, FontAwesome, GSAP, Lightbox2, Flickity, Dragdealer
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy.
  3. Website uses modern WordPress technologies and plugins.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack explicit consent mechanism.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No forms detected on homepage; contact likely via contact page.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected.
  10. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WPBakery Page Builder and uses Bootstrap 5.3.1 for responsive design. Additional libraries include FontAwesome for icons, GSAP for animations, Lightbox2 for image display, Flickity for carousels, and Dragdealer for drag interactions. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and CDNJS for some libraries. Performance is moderate with some minified assets cached. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA landmarks and skip links but could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alidem.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alidem.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.