Skip to main content

Security report for alexandria.cz

ALEXANDRIA s.r.o. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CK Alexandria is a Czech travel agency specializing in holiday packages to popular Mediterranean and exotic destinations such as Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Spain, Italy, Albania, Croatia, and Montenegro. The website presents a professional and well-structured platform offering last minute deals, animation programs, and premium club memberships. The company targets general consumers seeking vacation travel, with a medium-sized market presence in the hospitality sector in the Czech Republic. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Next.js and React, with integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Criteo. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust but is common for commercial entities. Overall, the site is safe, user-friendly, and business credible, though improvements in privacy transparency and security best practices are recommended.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of alexandria.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alexandria.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CK Alexandria operates as a travel agency offering a broad portfolio of holiday packages primarily focused on Mediterranean destinations. The business model revolves around package sales, last minute offers, and value-added services like animation programs and premium club memberships. The company appears to have a strong foothold in the Czech travel market, leveraging partnerships with hotels and resorts. The website content is professionally presented with detailed hotel listings, pricing, and promotional offers. The use of multiple advertising and tracking services suggests a focus on targeted marketing and customer engagement. However, the absence of publicly accessible WHOIS data and privacy policy pages indicates areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The company’s digital presence is mature, but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy disclosures to strengthen customer trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with privacy regulations. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-XSS-Protection were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site uses multiple third-party tracking scripts, increasing the attack surface and raising privacy considerations. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are best practices for mature security postures. The lack of WHOIS transparency also reduces the ability to verify domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a security policy and incident response contact to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ALEXANDRIA s.r.o.
Description
Nejširší nabídka zájezdů do Bulharska. Dovolená a zájezdy do oblíbených destinací: Bulharsko, Řecko, Turecko, Španělsko, Itálie, Albánie, Chorvatsko, Kypr, Černá Hora, S. A. Emiráty ...
Key services
Holiday packages, Last minute offers, Animation programs, Premium club membership
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Font Awesome 6, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Smartlook, Adform, Seznam RC, Criteo
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Smartlook, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Criteo
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Smartlook
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional travel agency site with extensive holiday offers.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Contact phone number clearly displayed in header.
  6. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts used.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. HTTPS is used, but security headers are not detected in provided data.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Good use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, providing server-side rendering and improved performance. Font Awesome 6 is used for icons, and multiple analytics and marketing tools are integrated such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Smartlook, Adform, and Criteo. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloading of key images for performance. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. SEO is supported with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization especially regarding third-party scripts. The absence of CMS identification suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy-focused improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alexandria.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alexandria.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.