Skip to main content

Security report for alenmedpromotion.com

AlenMed Promotion · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AlenMed Promotion is a medium-sized company specializing in the marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical products, primarily operating in Latvia and Belarus. The company positions itself as an international team of experts providing comprehensive business solutions, market entry strategies, and risk management for pharmaceutical manufacturers. Their website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact information and detailed business descriptions. Technically, the site is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, uses modern JavaScript libraries, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA and analytics tools to enhance security and track user interactions. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Privacy compliance is strong with detailed cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business with a solid digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alenmedpromotion.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AlenMed operates in the healthcare sector focusing on pharmaceutical marketing and distribution. Their business model is B2B, targeting pharmaceutical manufacturers and healthcare professionals. The company has established a network of representative offices, with headquarters in Riga, Latvia, and a significant presence in Minsk, Belarus. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive approach to market entry, outsourcing, and risk management. The website indicates a stable and growing business with professional branding and trust indicators such as licenses and certificates. Partnerships with local entities like the website development studio are evident. The company appears to be well-positioned regionally with potential for further expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented on forms to prevent automated abuse. The cookie consent mechanism is detailed and GDPR compliant, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of reputable third-party services like Google and Yandex for analytics and security is a positive indicator. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AlenMed Promotion
Description
AlenMed is an international team of experts specializing in marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical products. They provide comprehensive business solutions, promote products in new markets, apply outsourcing principles, and manage risks effectively. The company operates mainly in Latvia and Belarus with a network of representative offices.
Key services
Marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical products, Business solutions for pharmaceutical companies, Market entry and promotion, Outsourcing services, Risk management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bitrix CMS, jQuery, Slick Slider, Google reCAPTCHA, Yandex Metrica, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bitrix Framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrica, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrica
Marketing tools
Bitrix CMS analytics, Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with English and Latvian language options.
  3. Company operates in pharmaceutical marketing and distribution sector.
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categorization.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone numbers and email.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. Use of Google reCAPTCHA and analytics tools indicates attention to security and tracking.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with a reputable registrar and has a long registration period.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Slider for UI components. Google reCAPTCHA is integrated for form security, and analytics are handled via Yandex Metrica and Google Analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. The technical stack is stable and suitable for the business needs, though some improvements in security headers and accessibility could be made to reduce technical debt and enhance user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alenmedpromotion.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alenmedpromotion.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.