Skip to main content

Security report for albertinen-haus.de

Albertinen Haus · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Albertinen Haus is a recognized healthcare and senior living provider based in Hamburg, Germany, offering a comprehensive range of services including ambulatory and residential care, dementia support, and therapy programs. The organization is part of the larger Immanuel Albertinen Diakonie network, which strengthens its market position and service offerings. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, featuring a modern, responsive design with good accessibility and SEO practices. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no security headers or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident, indicating areas for improvement in security and compliance. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image suitable for its target audience of seniors and healthcare stakeholders.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching albertinen-haus.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention albertinen-haus.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for albertinen-haus.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Albertinen Haus operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on senior care and community health services. Its business model centers on providing integrated care solutions, combining residential, ambulatory, and therapeutic services. The organization leverages its affiliation with Immanuel Albertinen Diakonie to extend its reach and credibility. The website's extensive external links to related healthcare entities demonstrate a broad partnership ecosystem. The target customer segments include elderly individuals requiring care, their families, and healthcare professionals. Growth indicators include active community projects and digital inclusion initiatives. The business maintains a strong regional presence in Hamburg with medium organizational size.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Forms include hidden tokens suggesting protection against CSRF attacks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers and publish a security.txt file to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to strengthen site security.
  3. Add a security.txt file and a clear vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for data protection officer or security incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and CMS extensions to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Albertinen Haus
Description
Das Albertinen Haus ist eine bundesweit anerkannte Einrichtung in Hamburg-Schnelsen, die ein umfassendes Konzept für ambulante und stationäre Pflege, selbstständiges Wohnen älterer Menschen sowie Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention anbietet. Es engagiert sich aktiv im Quartier für digitale Teilhabe Älterer und fördert den Kontakt zwischen Alt und Jung.
Key services
Service-Wohnen (service apartments), Wohnpflege-Einrichtung (residential care), Ambulanter Pflegedienst (ambulatory nursing service), Angebote für Menschen mit Demenz (services for people with dementia), Therapiezentrum (therapy center), Quartiersprojekte (community projects)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, CSS, JavaScript, Glide.js slider
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Secure forms with hidden fields and tokens

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on senior healthcare and community services.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the main page.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and address.
  5. Multiple external links to related healthcare and diaconal organizations.
  6. Uses TYPO3 CMS with modern web technologies and responsive design.
  7. No visible security headers detected; security posture could be improved.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  10. Social media presence includes Twitter handle @IADiakonie.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a mature and extensible content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. The use of Glide.js for sliders and responsive images shows attention to user experience and performance. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features such as skip navigation links and ARIA labels. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Performance is moderate, with compressed CSS and lazy loading images. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not explicit in the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with albertinen-haus.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review albertinen-haus.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.