Skip to main content

Security report for akvilona.lv

Akvilona · Healthcare · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Akvilona is a Latvian healing center and educational organization focused on spiritual healing, professional training, and community events. The website presents a well-structured platform with rich content including news, events, testimonials, and educational resources. It targets individuals interested in healing and spiritual development, operating primarily as a small-sized entity in the healthcare and education sectors. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder, with SEO optimized via Yoast plugin and structured data. The site is mobile-friendly and offers a good user experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akvilona.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Akvilona operates as a niche healing and educational center with a focus on professional healing training and community engagement through events and festivals. Its business model appears non-profit or educational, serving a Latvian-speaking audience with multilingual support. The organization maintains active social media channels and publishes regular updates and testimonials, indicating a stable community presence. The lack of WHOIS data limits external verification, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate and established entity founded in 2003. Partnerships with professional healing leagues and event organizations enhance its credibility. Growth indicators include ongoing events, exhibitions, and academic programs.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. Forms appear limited to search functionality without sensitive data collection. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for security issues. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy notices, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links on the website.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and provide security contact information.
  4. Improve accessibility features to comply with standards and enhance user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akvilona
Description
Dziedniecība
Key services
Healing center services, Professional healing academy, Events and festivals, Educational lectures and publications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Avada theme, Fusion Builder
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple pages
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with language alternates for Russian and English
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  9. Good SEO practices with Yoast plugin and structured data
  10. Website uses WordPress with Avada theme and Fusion Builder
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. The use of Yoast SEO plugin and structured JSON-LD data shows attention to SEO best practices. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information available. The site uses jQuery and standard web technologies. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking scripts, which may reflect a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing automation. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests areas for modernization and compliance improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akvilona.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akvilona.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.