Skip to main content

Security report for akmensnami.lv

Akmens Nami · Energy · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Akmens Nami is a Latvian company specializing in Building Information Modeling (BIM) management, LEED building certification, and dynamic energy analysis services. The company positions itself as a professional and experienced team offering integrated digital construction lifecycle solutions aimed at improving efficiency, transparency, and sustainability in building projects. Their market focus includes developers, architects, and building owners interested in green building certifications and energy optimization. The website is built on WordPress with a professional design and multilingual support, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks modern security headers and uses outdated software versions, which could expose the site to vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the business appears credible with clear service offerings and social media presence, but WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting full trust verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akmensnami.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy and real estate sectors, providing essential services that complement each other, such as BIM management, LEED certification, and energy analysis. This integrated approach gives them a competitive advantage in the Latvian construction market. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting professional clients requiring compliance and sustainability consulting. The presence of social media channels and a multilingual website suggests efforts to expand reach and client engagement. However, the lack of visible privacy and security policies may impact trust with privacy-conscious clients. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating a standalone small business. The company was founded around 2018, consistent with the domain's content publication dates.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which help mitigate common web attacks. The WordPress version (4.9.26) and jQuery (1.12.4) are outdated and may contain known vulnerabilities, increasing risk exposure. No security.txt or incident response contacts were found, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or credentials were detected in the HTML. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking but lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to the latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy or security.txt file with contact information for security issues.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to proactively identify and remediate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akmens Nami
Description
SIA “Akmens nami” is a team of experienced professionals providing BIM management, LEED building certification, and dynamic building energy analysis services.
Key services
BIM management, LEED building certification and maintenance, Dynamic building energy analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.26, PHP, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Analytics, WPBakery Page Builder, Jupiter Theme, LBG Logo Showcase plugin, WPML Multilingual CMS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Contact information includes a Latvian phone number and a contact page link.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn is confirmed.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with several plugins and a custom child theme.
  6. Google Analytics is implemented for visitor tracking.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit data protection officer contact information found.
  9. Business focuses on BIM, LEED certification, and energy analysis services.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.26 with a custom child theme based on Jupiter theme and uses WPBakery Page Builder for content management. It includes plugins such as LBG Logo Showcase and WPML for multilingual support. The front-end uses jQuery 1.12.4 and Google Fonts (Montserrat). Google Analytics is integrated asynchronously for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization and website. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The site lacks modern security headers and uses outdated libraries, which should be updated to reduce technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akmensnami.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akmensnami.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.