Skip to main content

Security report for akana.lv

SIA AKANA · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA AKANA is a Latvian engineering company specializing in the construction of water supply, heating, and sewage systems. The company positions itself as a reliable partner with a professional team and long-term infrastructure solutions. The website reflects a small but established business with clear contact information and partnerships with recognized construction firms. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Maps API, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and visible analytics, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security maturity. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, but the business content appears consistent and professional. Overall, the website is safe, well-structured, and suitable for its target audience, though it would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akana.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention akana.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for akana.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy and infrastructure sector within Latvia, targeting construction companies and state institutions. Its business model focuses on B2B engineering and construction services. The website highlights multiple years of experience and collaborations with leading construction firms, indicating a stable market position. The lack of detailed financial or founding year data limits deeper business intelligence insights. The partnership ecosystem is visible through logos of associated companies, suggesting a collaborative approach. Growth indicators such as ongoing projects and realized projects are mentioned but not quantified in detail. Overall, the company appears to be a small, specialized player with a focus on quality and reliability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of advanced security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The contact form is present but lacks visible anti-spam or security features. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. The absence of WHOIS data prevents verification of domain registration legitimacy. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, securing forms, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Enhance contact form security with CAPTCHA and input validation.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "AKANA"
Registration number
42403038714
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA AKANA
Description
SIA AKANA is a Latvian company specializing in the construction of water supply, heating, and sewage systems. They emphasize high quality, precision, and long-term infrastructure solutions. Their team consists of experienced professionals collaborating with leading construction companies and state institutions.
Key services
Water supply system construction, Heating system construction, Sewage system construction, Infrastructure engineering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by Google Maps API usage with key
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No social media links or security policy disclosures present.
  6. Technical stack is modern but basic; uses Bootstrap and common JS libraries.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Maps API.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  9. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Fonts, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Google Maps API integration enhances location presentation. The site is moderately performant but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. The absence of analytics tools suggests minimal user tracking, which may be positive for privacy but limits marketing insights. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates areas for modernization and compliance improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akana.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akana.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.