Skip to main content

Security report for akainsurance.lv

AKA Insurance SIA · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AKA Insurance SIA operates as an insurance brokerage firm based in Latvia, offering a wide range of insurance products including vehicle (OCTA, KASKO), travel, property, commercial property, accident, and health insurance. The company positions itself as a broker intermediary that simplifies the insurance purchasing process by comparing offers from multiple insurers to provide the best options to customers. The website is professionally designed, primarily targeting Latvian-speaking customers, and includes partner links to related logistics and transport companies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO optimizations, though Google Analytics is present but not fully configured. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible security headers and a published privacy policy, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy for its business domain but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akainsurance.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector with a focus on insurance brokerage services. Its business model revolves around acting as an intermediary between customers and multiple insurance providers, offering comparative quotes and facilitating complex insurance projects involving multiple insurers. The presence of partner domains suggests a networked business ecosystem in logistics and transport. The company appears to be small-sized and founded around 2017, consistent with the website's published dates. Revenue streams likely come from brokerage commissions. The website content and structure indicate a focus on Latvian customers seeking diverse insurance products. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. Strategic partnerships and clear branding support market positioning as a reliable broker.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a critical security baseline. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published privacy policy and incident response contacts represents compliance gaps. Google Analytics is present but not configured, which may indicate incomplete data governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Properly configure or remove unused Google Analytics tracking to ensure data governance.
  4. Add explicit contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly review and update WHOIS information and ensure domain registration details are accessible to improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AKA Insurance SIA
Description
AKA Insurance - apdrošināšanas brokera pakalpojumi. Taupiet laiku un saņemiet labāko apdrošināšanas piedāvājumu kopā ar mums. OCTA, KASKO, ceļojumu, īpašuma, komercīpašuma, nelaimes gadījumu apdrošināšana, veselības apdrošināšanu un citi apdrošināšanas pakalpojumi.
Key services
OCTA, KASKO, Travel insurance, Property insurance, Commercial property insurance, Accident insurance, Health insurance, Inbound traveler insurance, Aircraft insurance, Ship insurance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Fonts (Fira Sans), jQuery, Chosen jQuery plugin, Fancybox, Leaflet.js, jQuery UI, BxSlider
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local insurance customers.
  3. No explicit privacy policy page found, but cookie policy and consent mechanism present.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust verification.
  8. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  9. Partner domains alogistika.lv and akatrans.lv linked in navigation.
  10. No terms of service or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, jQuery, Chosen plugin, Fancybox, Leaflet.js, and BxSlider. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. SEO is enhanced with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. The site uses Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akainsurance.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akainsurance.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.